Nego Di and Partner are sentenced to more than 11 years in prison for blows with online store

The humorist and influencer Dilson Alves da Silva Neto, better known as Nego Di, was sentenced to 11 years and 8 months in prison closed by estelionato, with businessman Anderson Bonetti.

The decision, signed on Tuesday (10), refers to a fraudulent sales scheme through the online store Tadizuera, which marketed electronics and appliances at prices below the market-to deliver products to consumers.

According to the Rio Grande do Sul Court, the crimes occurred between March and July 2021 and reached at least 18 victims in the city of Canoas, in the metropolitan region of Porto Alegre. Customers say that after making payments for items such as televisions, smartphones and air conditioners, they have not received the goods or had their values ​​reversed.

The sentence, issued by Judge Patrícia Pereira Krebs Tonet, describes the case as a “meticulously organized scheme to deceive a large audience, earning expressive financial advantage” and “very high social injury”. The magistrate pointed out that the coup targeted low -income people, interested in essential consumer goods, and used Nego Di’s public credibility to gain range.

In an official note, lawyer Camila Kersch states that Dilson “was never a partner of Anderson Bonetti, nor participated in the management of the platform” and that his image was used to promote the site. According to her, the humorist had no direct involvement in sales or benefited financially from the transactions.

The defense also disputes the idea that the case involves hundreds of victims. “The process judged in the County of Canoas involves only 18 victims, and all who accepted were voluntarily reimbursed by Dilson during the course of criminal action,” says the text, who criticizes the absence of individualization of penalties in the sentence.

Another argument presented is that the defendant himself, Anderson Bonetti, would have judicially recognized that Nego Di was also a victim of the scheme and had no control over business operations. The defense plans to appeal the decision and states that it trusts a more exempt review by the higher instances.

Nego Di was arrested preventively in July last year and remained for more than four months at Canoas State Penitentiary. Her defense questions the motivation of the arrest, pointing out that she occurred 11 months after the completion of the police inquiry.

Full Note:

The defense of Dilson Alves da Silva Neto, represented by this lawyer, Camila Kersch, has been publicly expressed about the sentence that sentenced him to 11 years and 8 months in prison, in closed regime, for alleged practice of estelionate in the case involving the online store “Tadizuera”.

It is essential to clarify that Dilson was never a partner of Anderson Bonetti, nor participated in the management of the platform. Its image was used to promote the project, relying on the information and responsibilities attributed to the other party involved. There was no formal corporate bond, nor joint action in business management.

Another point that deserves clarification is the divergence between what has been disclosed by the press and the case file. Although media outlets are reporting that there would be more than 300 victims, the process judged in the Canoas County involves only 18 victims. This inaccuracy has generated distorted perceptions and unfairly expanded the negative repercussion against Dilson.

It is also noteworthy that all victims of this process that they accepted were reimbursed by Dilson voluntarily, even during the course of criminal action, which demonstrates his commitment to fully repair the damages – even though he did not perform acts or benefited directly from transactions.

Since the instructional hearing, the defense already observed signs of bias in the process. This impression was confirmed in the sentence: Even with the description of distinct conduct among the defendants, the same penalty was applied to both, without individualization, in disrespect for fundamental constitutional guarantees, including the individualization of the penalty and due process.

In judicial interrogation, the defendant himself acknowledged that Dilson was also a victim of the context, which reinforces the thesis that he had no dominion about the operation of the store and acted relying on the guidelines of those who conducted commercial activities.

The chronology of pre -trial detention is also a source of question:

On 08/24/2023, the police authority completed the investigation and represented Dilson’s preventive arrest;

Only on 07/12/2024, 11 months later, the prosecutor’sily expressed favorably to prison – coincidentally after Dilson was publicly positioned, between May and June 2024, on state omission during floods in Rio Grande do Sul and transparency in PIX donations promoted by the state government;
The court decision declared the arrest was also issued on 07/12/2024.

That is, only almost a year after the request of the police authority, and after Dilson’s intense exposure on social networks in criticism of the performance of public agencies, is that there was the judicial granting of pre -trial detention.

The defense informs that it will file the appropriate appeals against the conviction and is confident that the higher instances will reevaluate the facts with exemption, recognizing the procedural vices, the absence of intent and collaborative behavior of Dilson throughout the process.