OR J. Mr. Rowling (JK Rowling)the author of the award -winning series of adventures with Harry Potter hero, characterized the actress Emma Watson “Adai”, amidst their conflict over trans people.

The author implied that the actress’s public criticism of her attitude towards the sex “threw oil on the fire” for the insults she has suffered. J. Mr. Rowling also rejected the actor’s recent statement that he “still appreciates her”.

The actress had expressed her disagreement with the author’s views on gender, responding to Rowling’s article on the need to create spaces for a single sex with a tweet in 2020: “Trans are what they say they are and deserve to live their lives, without constantly being contested or telling them that they are not what they say they are.”

In a post he posted today, according to the Daily Mail, the author insisted that Watson and her co -stars, Daniel Radclif and Rupert Grint, have “every right to adopt the ideology of gender identity”. However, J. Mr Rowling accused the actors of taking advantage of the reputation they have gained from the series and of acting as its “de facto representatives”. Rowling then turned its “fire” to Watson, implying that her views on trans people’s rights were due to her lack of experience in real life.

In fact, she said angry: “I wasn’t a multimillionaire at my 14th. I was living in poverty while writing the book that made Emma famous. “I see quite a few comments about it, so I want to make some remarks”, The writer wrote in X and continued: “The actors who once played characters I created do not need to get my permission. The idea is just as ridiculous as asking my boss – when I was 21 – about what views I should have today.

Emma Watson and her co -stars have every right to adopt the ideology of gender identity. Such beliefs are legally protected and I would not want to see any of them threatened with loss of work, violence or death because of them.

However, Emma and Dan have in particular made it clear in recent years that they believe that our former professional relationship gives them a special right – no, obligation – to criticize me and my views publicly. Years after the end of Harry Potter’s filming, they continue to take on the role of de facto representatives of the world I created.

When you know people from the age of ten, it is difficult to get rid of a certain protection. Until recently, I had not been able to forget the image of the children who needed to guide them kindly in their dialogues in a large and scary film studio. In recent years, I have repeatedly refused invitations by journalists to comment on their statements.

I understand from my own experience what it means for women – and girls who do not have her privileges – the abuse of their rights, in which Emma participated with such enthusiasm. “the author notes.

And ends: “Adults cannot wait to be associated with an activist movement that regularly calls for the ” murder of character ” of a friend/girlfriend and then claim their right to the love of the ex -friend, as if they were actually their mother. Emma has every right to disagree with me and publicly discuss her feelings for me, but I have the same right and finally I decided to exercise it. “

Recently, the actress, in an interview with “Hollywood Authentic”, who has abandoned acting informally, spoke more extensively about her abstinence from the profession, saying that while she liked to play roles, however “I don’t miss selling things. I found it quite devastating for my soul. But I miss you to use my skills and I miss the art very much ».