Two sisters have filed a request for injunctive measures for personal injury against a 43-year-old man who accuses them of killing his cat last summer.

In fact, as the 68-year-old and the 70-year-old complain in their application, have received personal verbal attacks from the 43-year-old, while he himself has also made a post on a social networking page where he mentions specific information about those, which he presents as being responsible for the death of his animal. This posting by the 43-year-old has been made on the page of the Rhodes Kennel and there it is alleged that he motivates its members to go to the businesses owned by the two sisters and to woo them.

Specifically, the application for interim measures was filed yesterday, at the Single-Member Court of First Instance of Rhodes, by the lawyer Mr. Stavros Skaros and according to what is mentioned in it, the two women live in a privately owned residence and the 43-year-old also lives near them, who keeps two dogs and several cats in his yard.

According to a report by rodiaki.gr, last summer (of 2023) the 43-year-old was looking for someone from the neighborhood who had killed, as he claimed, one of his cats. In fact, he called the police in order to obtain a statement from the two sisters, as well as from other people he considered suspicious regarding the incident he reported. However, according to the police, there was no indication of any wrongdoing by any of the persons they considered suspects, including both women.

But on November 12, according to the restraining order application, and while one of the two sisters went to get out of her house and into her car, she jumped the wall that separates their residences and shouting asking her about the death of his cat and asking her to admit it. A similar incident happened the next day with the other sister whom he also abused and pressured her to confess that either she did it or her sister did it.

The post he made is also described in the same application the 43-year-old on the page (on social media) of the Kennel where he “photographs” the two sisters, with dozens of negative comments about them following the post. The two women also allege that he induces members of the group to go to the businesses they own and bribe them.

“In this particular post, but also in the comments on it, the 43-year-old is spreading false information about usallegedly knowing that we killed his cat in order to extract information from the rest of the internet users and collect any incriminating material against us, which he obviously does not have.

also motivates other users by appealing to emotion, as he declares that he is threatened by us and that he has no help from anyone, to avenge us in every way.

Because of his posts we receive threatening phone calls at our work daily, visits from alleged clients who, in front of our other clients, manage to discredit us the first time by telling me that “the police know the truth” etc., the two sisters characteristically report.

For these reasons, they ask the court with their application, among other things:

• For the 43-year-old to remove from the internet site “Google” and “Tripadvisor” the false, malicious and slanderous reviews and evaluations, which he has submitted as well as the people who did it on his instructions and whom he has recruited to this purpose and to refrain from submitting malicious comments and evaluations in the future on all social networking platforms and websites without exception.
• To prohibit the 43-year-old from approaching them at a distance of more than one hundred (100) meters, in order to prevent the systematic abuse of them every time he meets them, as well as the severe possible possibility of violence against them.
• To prohibit the 43-year-old from spreading against them the false and slanderous things he has done so far, namely that they threaten him and that they killed his cat, but also that he can invent, which are included in words that constitute insults as well as actions, thereby insulting their honor and reputation.
• To prohibit the 43-year-old from watching and obstructing the two women and thus the free movement in their apartment building.
• To omit in the future any act that insults their personality in any way (insulting, causing fear, following them, etc.)

The issuance of a temporary injunction by the court has also been requested for the case.