The prosecutor, who called the sufficient in the testimony, ruled that “he has nothing to do with the complainants, since the third party was used by the card”
By Helena Galaris
The Archive was set by the Supreme Court’s Attorney Achilleas Zisis, who is investigating the spy case of the new lawsuits filed by the President of the Movement for Change Nikos Androulakis and the journalist Thanassis Koukakis at the expense of a person who was used by the prepaid card. infected ‘messages.
The prosecutor, who invited the suicide to a testimony, ruled that “he has nothing to do with the complainants, since the third party was used by the card”.
Describing him as a biopaland, Mr Zisis concluded that the sufficient person has nothing to do with Intelexa, Krikel for whose representatives are pending accusations of violating telephone confidentiality but not any relationship with any person in EYP.
According to the investigation by a bank official, the card system was charged in the Card System with the amount of 500 € in the area of ​​Agia Paraskevi. The bank’s electronic system showed that it was done using a PIN rather than transferring money from the holder’s deposit account.
According to the witness, the depositor is an unknown person, unless there was a video material depicting himself, the date and time of deposit, but after two months it was destroyed.
Citing her experience in other cases it is not possible to recognize these persons in view of covering their face with objects.
The sue, as it turned out, received the card he had lost in a closed envelope and was inactive without the PIN code. He claims that he has nothing to do and does not know who has deposited the above amount or who sent the relevant messages.
The supreme prosecutor elsewhere in his finding points out that all victims of the espionage were notified by registered letter from the Personal Data Protection Authority if they would like to appeal to justice.
According to the public prosecutor, there is no application of the provisions of the Criminal Code cited by the lawyers on the offenses of espionage and the violation of confidentiality of telephone communications.
This is because, it is a prerequisite to actually cause a risk to the free functioning of the democratic system or for national security, which was undoubtedly resulting from the rich evidence of the preliminary examination despite the sufficient supported.
Source: Skai
I have worked as a journalist for over 10 years, and my work has been featured on many different news websites. I am also an author, and my work has been published in several books. I specialize in opinion writing, and I often write about current events and controversial topics. I am a very well-rounded writer, and I have a lot of experience in different areas of journalism. I am a very hard worker, and I am always willing to put in the extra effort to get the job done.
