The Supreme Court ratified a priest who sexually attacked a faithful time of confession by rejecting all his claims as unfounded as unfounded
The Fifth Criminal Department of the Supreme Court rejected all priest allegations as unfounded, who demanded that the decision was sentenced to be sentenced to the offense of insulting sexual dignity, to a 4 -month imprisonment of a three -year suspension, at the time of confession.
According to the conviction, in September 2020, “in a small chapel in the courtyard of the Holy Temple used by the priest for a confession space, during her confession …, she placed his hand through her blouse, staring at her in the chest, and then his finger went down and touched it on the genetic organs. “
At the end of the confession “embraced her and stroked her in the back, thereby brutally offended the dignity of the inquiry in the realm of sexual life.”
The priest, according to the Supreme Court’s ruling, “while pre -trial refusing any physical contact with the ecclesiastical, both in the hearing of the Court of First Instance and before the Secondary Court confessed that he touched his finger.”
According to the judges, the priest’s actions “were particularly challenging by brutally affecting the dignity of the sufferer, because of the way and the conditions under which he took place (confession, in secret conditions), while taking advantage of the secrecy of the process of the Holy Confession. “
Source: Skai
I have worked as a journalist for over 10 years, and my work has been featured on many different news websites. I am also an author, and my work has been published in several books. I specialize in opinion writing, and I often write about current events and controversial topics. I am a very well-rounded writer, and I have a lot of experience in different areas of journalism. I am a very hard worker, and I am always willing to put in the extra effort to get the job done.
