By Helena Galaris

Roula Pispirigou’s guilt and the death of 6.5 months of iris, was asked by the Joint Circuit Court by the Prosecutor of the headquarters who completed her marathon speech, essentially asking the judges to declare her 36 -year -old guilty.

Vassiliki Dimopoulou, who began her speech at 9am, following the guilt proposal for Malena, suggested guilty of the 36 -year -old defendant and for the last child of the Daskalaki family who was allegedly suffering from his mother’s hands in 2021, while in 202 first in life imprisonment.

“It worked immediately because Georgina was sleeping next to. He exerted pressure to make it quick and left signs. After completing her criminal work, she left the cloth on the swing. Why? Because it was dark, it didn’t turn on the light, since Georgina was sleeping. He was unable to distinguish the spots in the dark. Pispirigou drowns children to continue her marriage to Daskalakis“Said the prosecutor, who described the children of Ppirigu as” jerk Iphiges “on the altar of a marriage that their mother wished.

“Her self -centeredness eats her body. She wants to keep her husband near her. Her selfishness is superior to follow the living dream. What are the little girls? ‘Amuchs. The loss of love betrays her cold look, which is in agreement with her finger frost“She said in the conclusion of her speech. An speech, whose closure caused a strong reaction from the 36 -year -old mother, as well as Roula Pispirigou herself.

Much of her position, Mrs Dimopoulou dedicated it to forensic experts, who “have no sense of their responsibility” and did not deal with the deaths of three young children with seriousness and responsibility. The result of this “frivolity”, according to the prosecutor, was “to find the accused to cover her crimes”.

In a particularly rigorous style, the prosecutor criticized specific persons by attracting their attitude. “For me, there are two causes. Or they try to secure eager to cover their next cases in the future, or take advantage of work,” he said. Indeed, in the overall attitude of a specific forensic examiner, the prosecutor stressed that improper inspection in the iris data, which prevented the full assessment of findings and the revelation of the cause of the baby’s death, operated in favor of the accused and against Georgia: