In detail the e -mail between Christos Papadimitriou and Bart Akou – What the second is said to ignite the train details
Reveals are the e-mails between Christos Papadimitriou and Bart Akou who today brings to light the publicity Skai.gr About the Firefighting finding in the tragedy in Tempi. It is noted that an urgent preliminary examination on how it was included in the conclusion of EPANAAM’s conclusion, according to which it was considered as a possible cause of the fireplace unknown volatile flammable fluid, requests by the Public Prosecutor’s Office by the Public Prosecutor.
In contact with Bart Akou, No. 2 of the European Railway Organization, via e -mail, EPASAM Deputy Chairman Christos Papadimitriou appears to ask on February 17 (10 days before the finding of the finding) A real cause of the fire, “proposing that this expert will be presented on February 27, the day of the EKAAMAM finding.
In his answer, Mr. Akou says he is clear that the ignition of the train has not played a role in activating the fireplace. Indeed, he refers to recent videos, saying that the fact that this conclusion is not clearly supported by the videos does not mean that the findings arising from data are neglected.
Christos Papadimitriou’s e-mail to Bart listening
In detail Mr. Papadimitriou’s mail to Mr.
Dear Bart,
I would be very grateful if you could make the initial contact with the University of Lausanne, asking for a time frame and a range of money for further expertise, putting me in the notification, and I will take it from there.
(I have the green light from the minister to ask for any necessary expertise regardless of cost, and they will give us funding).
I think (assuming that we will not have a definitive conclusion about the fiery sphere) that this will be the only way forward to find the truth and respond to any categories to conceal the real cause of the fire.
If you agree with this, we could announce this further expertise on February 27th.
The answer is
On the same day, Bart hears to Christos Papadimitriou, conveying his absolute faith in fireplace that “transformers or other parts of the machines did not play a role in the ignition or evolution of the fiery sphere”.
It is also stated that “the fact that this conclusion is not explicitly confirmed by recent published videos, in no way contradicts the findings that have been constantly supported by clear evidence.”
In detail Bart’s e-mail to Christos Papadimitriou
Dear Christ,
Personally, after spending all the elements and re -written this part of the report over the weekend, I am convinced that we have a definitive conclusion about the fiery sphere: transformers or other parts of the machines did not play a role in ignition or evolution.
The fact that this conclusion is not expressly confirmed by recent published videos, in no way refutes the findings that have been constantly supported by clear evidence.
I believe this is the message we have to go from now on. Any further request for expertise would only be to verify and confirm it. The same is true of CFD analysis and any possible further review by the University of Ghent.
Just a footnote: Did Zoe have already asked you to sign the Ghent Contract for the previous analysis? They are desperately waiting for this to be able to send the invoice.
With appreciation,
Bart
Source: Skai
I have worked as a journalist for over 10 years, and my work has been featured on many different news websites. I am also an author, and my work has been published in several books. I specialize in opinion writing, and I often write about current events and controversial topics. I am a very well-rounded writer, and I have a lot of experience in different areas of journalism. I am a very hard worker, and I am always willing to put in the extra effort to get the job done.
