In a new post on social media, Maria Karystianou was fought against the Supreme Court prosecutor, Ms. Landless, asking some questions about managing the EPAAAM finding about the tragedy of Tempi.

The focus of Maria Karystianou’s criticism, who lost her daughter in the tragic accident of Tempi, is Georgia Picilin, who says that “He ordered a preliminary examination for unfair influence on judicial officers on the occasion of the non -convenient paragraphs of the National Organization – EPANAAM that connect the huge fireplace we saw on our screen and burned our children with chemicals (aromatic hydrocarbons) was done in the context of interrogation at the end of 2024“

In detail the post:

“Everything that goes beyond the government’s narrative is recalled!

Even the conclusion of EPODAAM, which we heard that cost the outrageous amount of € 4,500,000!

In addition to this there are rumors that there was € 1,500,000 for the resentment of the governmental communication policy for the Tempe case.

Is it true? We are asked by those responsible for managing the millions of the Greek people.

Today the country’s current government, Prosecutor of the Supreme Court, Mrs. Licensed, which:

  • (a) After the tragic crime of the Tempi he told the unmistakable relatives that they are done and referred us to the church for consolation
  • (b) who was deafeningly silenced by all complaints that have been made public for the one and only investigator, provided by the Justice for the Tempi case file, and even after the removal of this hot case file from the investigator Ms. Sourla. Even after the intervention of the Prime Minister, Kyriakos Mitsotakis, to him, also appointed by the government of the Supreme Court, Mr. Doyakos, who triggered the reasonable reaction of the Association of Judges and Prosecutors.
  • (c) who recently removed March 18 from the Head of the Larissa Public Prosecutor’s Office, Ms. Apostolakis the supervision of the Tempi file, and not in a random time, but the next day after we filed a request for supervisor to the Tempi investigator, Mr Bakaimis, today, he made a new move – intervening in the Flames. Convenient paragraphs of the National Organization’s finding – EPANAAM connecting the huge fireplace We saw on our screen and burned our children with chemicals (aromatic hydrocarbons) and exclude its challenge from silicone oils, as the Karoni experiment made in the context of the interrogation in late 2024.

But what does the provision of Article 167A of the Criminal Code used by Ms. Picelin:

Anyone who attempts to impose an influence or pressure or threatening to impose a judicial officer, a referee, or an act of act of acting in his duties or the failure of a legal act or the favorable or adverse treatment of a certain party, is punishable by imprisonment of at least one year and a financial penalty.

Since when a finding of a national organization, which has even defined the state itself, is it “unfair influence” or “pressure” or “threat” to a judicial officer?

Even a non -legal one realizes that one finding is that the word says, and it can not be an unfair influence or pressure or a threat to a judicial officer.

Here, even for the expertise, the law says that they are freely appreciated by judges, so that a finding that is one more freely assessed, can be an unfair influence or pressure or threat to a judicial officer?

Is the only influence that ultimately exists is the order of the Supreme Court’s prosecutor in itself, which inspires fear for anyone who dares to express a scientific view of the government’s narrative?

How does the prosecutor of the AP is indirectly except for a clear position on the issue that is still under investigation by the main interrogation, and therefore prejudice what is not only not given, but on the contrary is the search for?

So how can this order already level in our country to withstand this order for a preliminary examination – “message”?

How to withstand justice, legal science and those who honestly serve them?

And above all, how can we all withstand the defenseless citizens who are confronted with government nonsense and its willing supports?

Only if we remain united, a punch! We don’t bend! We’re not afraid! We don’t succumb …!‘