In order to have the validity required, he requests for the event of the fireplace during the collision of the two trains in the conflict of the two train. TempiEPANAAM, according to what is mentioned in the minutes of today’s meeting that took place.

ENDASAM also refers to the letter of Mr. Lakafosi, which was never received by the Deputy President.

It is noted that ‘the finding of OPANAAM It is a documentation and reference to all the errors that have led to the conflict and not a search for fireplace. “

In detail the content of the practice of today’s EPAAAM meeting:

PRACTICE No. 27/2025

T0Y COUNCIL CONSULTANT OF THE NATIONAL AIRCRAFT AND Railway and SAFETY OF TRANSPORT SECURITY (EODASAM).

The 27th/2025 meeting of the Council of the National Organization of Air Force and Transport Security and Transport Security (EODASAM) established by no. 275597/18 – 9 – 2023 (T. YODD 988/33) decision of the Minister of Infrastructure and Transport was held on Tuesday, at 09:00 in the EODASAM meeting room at 09:00. at the offices of the Organization (14-18, New Philadelphia) at the invitation of the Assistant President and the President of the Railway Division with the following issues:

DAY ITEMS

Update on a relatively Tempi finding

Present at the meeting were the following:

Chairman & Chairman of Air Sector: George Dritsakos

Deputy President & President of Sid/Kos: Papadimitriou Christos

Members: Flessas Gregory

Balaris Christos

Polite

Themes, discussions and decisions with the above composition are, as mentioned below.

Update on a relatively Tempi finding

The Council was extensively informed by the Deputy Chairman and Chairman of the Railway Sector on pending railway issues.

The Deputy Chairman suggested that he certainly proceed with Democritus in principle and then with others the strengthening and confirmation of the open point of the EPAAAM FACE regarding the causes of the fireplace in every possible way so that the explanation will be given.

It was also informed that the Vice President received a letter from Mr. Lakafosi claiming that the Deputy Chairman had been informed by an e -mail in which he was not recipient but also notification of his involvement in GANDO’s research in late January. The Deputy President said he had requested for a week to be given the relevant message if he existed and that he recognizes the existence of the particular message, which had not opened and read the attachments due to his huge volume of correspondence and his non -involvement with the investigation.

He also considers that the use of the territory by the Investigation Committee to calculate fireplace and cooperate with the University of Ghent was legally changed in any case and in any case but still believes that there were other ways to do the research without giving objectivity. While he still believes that only the Democritus or Supreme Foundation has the required dominant for this.

It was also informed that Mr. Papadimitriou tried with three emails to secure the consensus of the Pisa and Ghent universities so that the corresponding part of the finding would not be removed but it was not achieved so this move was legally necessary.

The conclusion of EPODAAM is a documentation and reference to all the errors that have led to the conflict and not research on the fireplace.

The Council expresses its support for the finding and excellent work of the investigation team and stresses that the assessment of non -participation in the phenomenon of the creation of the Silicone Fireplace is based on a certificate from Aristotle University of Thessaloniki Konstantopoulou and of course remains as it is.

Finally, he states that in no way states that the assessment included in the finding is incorrect but as the Commission itself had requested, it should be confirmed and certified immediately and when this finding is done, it will be reinstated with absolutely certified results and estimates.

According to the President of the Railway, the Council has the task of proceeding as soon as possible and in the most convenient way to certify the results of the Tempi investigation committee regarding the causes of the fireplace in top -notch and well -known prestigious university Asked what is the cause of the fireplace in Tempi since they are not silicone oils.

On the above points, Mr. Petros Eugenikos, a member of the Board of Directors, said that it should be clear and agreed by a decision of the Board of Directors. The exact object assigned to Democritus or any other research or university institution. In addition, the criteria for selection of any institution should be clearly imprinted on the causes of fireplace and other fires. He also asked to be informed in how (correspondence, letter, another way) was assigned to the Ghent University of the questions that the researchers of the university responded to their reports of 28/1/2025. Finally, he asked for specific information on the three emails reported by the Agency’s vice president that he sent to secure the consent of the Pisa and Ghent universities so as not to have to remove the corresponding part of the finding, as well as the reasons why it was not achieved.

The Council unanimously agreed with the proposals of the president of the railway sector.

Other issues. Non -existence other topic the meeting was completed.