In a letter to the newspaper “Everyday»The resigned deputy chairman of OPANAAM; Christos Papadimitriouhe makes an extensive description of his movements until the publication of the organization’s finding. Responding to the criticisms that followed his conflicting statements, Mr. Papadimitriou notes that “No oldness has been“For his part, he points out that he will not proceed with any other public intervention on the issue.

“Regarding the issue of fireplace, there was no romance except for my decision to remove the department of simulations following my correspondence with the Universities of Pisa and Ghent. I have never stated that Professor Konstantopoulos’s assessment would be removed for the contribution of Silicone Oils, to which I had already asked further answer to the question “if they are not silicone oils, then what was it that caused the fire”, “as he typically notes.

In addition, in terms of fireplace, it reiterates that the investigation team on the initiative of its executives ERA (European Railway Organization) He decided to work with the University of Ghent, but added that:

‘The Council was aware of its participation Soil Throughout the process of completing the research of the University of Ghent and the presentation of the finding in mid -February and asked the Commission not to include in the finding of the relevant chapter before ratifying the finding by a top institution, but due to the relevant Court of Appeal, Obligation to certify by a supreme body. “

“I never approved the participation of the land”

At the same time, Mr. Papadimitriou states that cooperation with the technical advisers of victims and experts is foreseen by European law and became transparent, but he himself “never” as president of the railway sector approved the participation of the land in the research of the University of Ghent.

“Only with the completion of the investigations on 28/1 with a mail, in which I was not even a recipient, but mere notification, one could theoretically understand this participation, but my attention was explained and explained to the Council in mid -February, so that the Council did not say that the Council did not say that only accepted to add a phrase for further investigation. “

Finally, he speaks of a “excellent scientific finding” by EPANAAM, which reflects 13 emergency security recommendations in OSE, RAS, Ministries and Hellenic Train and 4 in the European Commission and ERA.

“For this reason, and it had to be publicized by ENDAAMA its findings as soon as possible, especially on 27/2 within the year of the start of the investigation. Postponement would be the easy solution, but it would not help security. “