On the occasion of her decision Association of Judges and Prosecutors to draw on judges in workstations, in protest of the new bill Code of Civil ProcedureThe Ministry of Justice, in a statement, states that “it does not justify the abstinence of judicial officials from the performance of their duties” and adds that the Constitution “prohibits any form of strike to judicial officers”.
In particular, the Board of Directors of the Association of Judges and Prosecutors decided to take place at two -hour jobs from 10am to 12pm, from Monday 30 June to Wednesday, July 2, 2025, in protest for the Ministry of Justice’s law.
Today, the justice ministry In a statement, he states that the formation and evolution of the new CCP bill, “which serves to upgrade the quality and accelerate civil proceedings, does not justify the abstinence of judicial officers from the performance of their duties” and adds: “Not only is it premature but premature but prematurely but prematurely but premature premature. prohibits any form of strike to judicial officers. “
More specifically, the announcement by the Ministry of Justice is as follows:
“The draft law entitled:” Interventions in the Code of Civil Procedure – Declarations on the publication of will – amendments to the regulatory framework of opposition to forced execution in order to accelerate the trial – other provisions of the Ministry of Justice, which has Supreme judges and lawyers, while in his training participated in all stages of his formation, a spokesman for the “Union of Judges and Prosecutors”.
The Ministry of Justice, during the consultation, in addition to the dialogue with social partners, is awaiting comments and observations, with the aim of improving and completing the proposed provisions. In this context, judicial officers and their representatives are in daily contact with the ministry.
Any individual disagreement of the “Union of Judges and Prosecutors” in a bill underway and evolve, serving quality upgrading and accelerating civil proceedings, does not justify the abstinence of judicial officials from the performance of their duties. Not only is it premature but prejudice to the ethics of consultation and is in contrast to the current constitutional provision, which prohibits any form of strike to judicial officers. “
Source: Skai
I have worked as a journalist for over 10 years, and my work has been featured on many different news websites. I am also an author, and my work has been published in several books. I specialize in opinion writing, and I often write about current events and controversial topics. I am a very well-rounded writer, and I have a lot of experience in different areas of journalism. I am a very hard worker, and I am always willing to put in the extra effort to get the job done.
