Developments in the double murder case in Finikounda are rapid.

The perpetrator is said to be a 22 -year -old man arrested earlier at his home in Kallithea and showed as guilty by a peer who appeared voluntarily at noon in GADA with his lawyer, displaying himself as an accomplice.

As he said to the authorities he had personal differences with the victim, and explained the goal was not to kill him but to earn money.

The 22 -year -old was transferred and apologized to GADA.

His accomplice remains there, and at the beginning he went early in the evening and the nephew of the victim who was an eyewitness to recognize the defendants, as he allegedly testified, had seen the 22 -year -old’s face features.

At the same time, information arising from the lawyer of the accused associate-passenger in the machine was known.

In any case, the alleged natural perpetrator of the assassination until this time keeps a “silent fish”, stressing that he will only speak the presence of his lawyer.

The time of arrest in Kallithea

Shortly after 15:30, police officers from the Life Crime Department arrived at Mantzagriotakis Street in Kallithea and arrested the natural perpetrator of the murder, as if waiting for it, did not resist.

His arrest came a few hours after his accomplice his confession and after the aforementioned he had named him as a natural perpetrator.

The two young men stay within walking distance and this seems to have mobilized the authorities which, according to information, had been closely monitored, at least on Sunday.

Neighbors say the 22 -year -old “had not given rights”, presenting him as a quiet young man who did not have many contacts with the tenants of the apartment building.

At the same time, shortly after 18:30 the authorities went home to the 22 -year -old accomplice to carry out home checks and take deposits from relatives.

Finikunda

The brutal assassination case seems to have reached a “focal point” as police officers had identified a video material with the perpetrators driving their scooter to the area.

Experts in the area, the defendants appear to have arrived at the campsite from a different route behind the facilities in order to surprise the victim.

There were 6 shots in three minutes and then the perpetrators left in the dark.

A few minutes later, they moved from the provincial road to Pylos and then to Kyparissia and Pyrgos, followed by coastal roads.

The three faces of the thriller

Three faces appear to be the protagonists of the thriller in Finikunda:

The two 22 -year -old accused of murder but also the 33 -year -old nephew and heir to the victim.

A 22 -year -old, allegedly a passenger on the machine, claims that at the age of 19, he was sexually abused by the murdered, which he did not complain about to extract money.

When, as he claims, the 68 -year -old stopped giving him money, he decided, given his bad financial situation, to return to Finikounda in order to push the victim and even admitted that he was “behind” by the two attempts at the 68 -year -old murder, which was preceded by 10 and 10/9.

In any case, he does not accept that he is a natural perpetrator of the murder, on the contrary, he says that when the 68 -year -old ceased to be involved in blackmail, he addressed the 22 -year -old named as a natural perpetrator.

The allegedly a physicist had said as it seems “don’t worry, I will make him scared.”

The two peers were reportedly known by many drug tracks.

Murder

According to the report, the perpetrator of the murder approached the victim wearing a blonde wig, and threatening it with the gun allegedly told him in English that he “knows what he is doing here in children, summers”, demanding to give money.

The nephew

The victim’s nephew, heir to the victim, was present in the murderous attack and is known to the 22 -year -old accused.

In fact, he seems to have been the “connecting link” of the victim and victim acquaintance after he met the 22 -year -old a few years ago, he developed contacts and invited him for a free vacation at his uncle’s campsite.

In any case, the 22 -year -old argues that neither the 33 -year -old nor anyone but the 22 -year -old accused as a natural perpetrator, did not know about his rape.

It is worth noting, however, that the authorities, through removal of confidentiality of communications, have identified a 22 -year -old person who could have served as a moral perpetrator, without excluding the possibility of a standing meeting of attracting the two goals.

In fact, there is a conversation between the two young men, the night before the tradition of one.

The two young men are discussing a possible surrender to the authorities, with one of the two, the alleged assassin, refusing.

At the same time, they are skeptical of which of the two young men was the one who pressed the trigger.