Another attack on her Athena Linou launched today with a post on Facebook Pavlos Polakis.

“He had the audacity, yesterday afternoon, while I was here (photo 1) saying goodbye to Crete and Sfakia, to call me!!!! He told me that “he thought we had a good cooperation for ten years”!!! I cut her off by saying that “we didn’t work together, we met at university and I thought she had an offer and an honesty despite my disagreements with some of her statements. But after she set up this fake cry to orchestrate my deletion, I looked into her activity to find out what was going on and of course to defend herself against character assassination and I saw that she is BOTH DISHONORABLE AND CORRUPT!! That’s why he shouldn’t dare to call me again.” END OF CALL!!” wrote the MP of Chania.

“He also had the audacity, yesterday afternoon, while I was here (photo 1) saying goodbye to Crete and Sfakia, to call me!!!!
He told me that “he thought we had a good cooperation for ten years”!!!

I cut her off by saying “we didn’t work together, we met from the university and I thought she had an offer and an honesty despite my disagreements with some of her statements. But after she set up this fake cry to lead to my deletion, I looked for her her activity to understand what is going on and of course to defend herself for character assassination and I saw that she is BOTH DISHONORABLE AND CORRUPT!! So don’t you dare call me again”

END OF CALL!!

PS .Assist technocrats committee and president manager:

1) After yesterday’s revelation with the warrants, you should have taken immediate action! The fact that you don’t shows a lot…
2) Mrs. Linou says that her Institute is audited by certified auditors every year and that it has no profits.
We entered his website, in the section that says transparency https://www.prolepsis.gr/gr/content/diafaneia/
And we saw what photo 3 shows.
Which means that there was no check in 2021 or 2022. And we don’t even know what happened in 2023, because he hasn’t posted the data. Hey, don’t present this situation to us for “transparency” and control. It’s the opposite. First this.
Now let’s go to the second and even more important. Let’s open the 2022 tab:
There we see (PHOTO 4) that from the management of 2022 your Institute has approximately 154,000 euros in profits. (Income: €2,396,250, Expenses: €2,242,210). You write them, Mrs. Linou, not me, I just understand what I read and repost it.
And also, we read there that there are 282,500 euros in the Fund of your Institute from the previous year (2021).
And I ask. If after all this we say that your Institute is making a profit (while it is non-profit and is prohibited by Law from making a profit) are we telling a lie?
Answer if you have arguments. Or let those who cover you and who support you and ask for my deletion from SYRIZA, like Olga, answer.
Otherwise, if you can’t answer, don’t complain and threaten!
3) Mrs. Linou is proud of the awesome and terrible scientific basis of the student meals program that your Institute does. Let’s see. We enter your relevant website
We wait to read analyses, specifications, measurements … and finally ((PHOTO 5) what do we read? That the meals use wholemeal flour, olive oil, and no preservatives… Well, how many Harvards does one have to finish to obtain such a high standard knowledge…
And it really impresses that it does write what each meal consists of, but nowhere do you mention quantities and grams. Why is that? Is that how you do it over there at Harvard? Because here in our country, I don’t think there is a person who has seen a diet chart without writing amounts and grams. One more thing. Is it possible to give the children in the first break, that is, for tithe, to eat chicken? Well, which nutritionists thought of this?
And also, as for the quality controls you write that you do, nowhere did I read a process of quality selection of suppliers, that they have ISO, etc. Nowhere, nowhere… But, here, the well-known Giannitsis being tested for poisoning hundreds of children, was your stable supplier, with invoices of approximately €206,000 only for 2023… (photo 6)
In conclusion and considering the fanfare you use, one comes to mind: “seaweed for silk ribbons”.
Mockery really has its limits.