By Gifts Antoniou

In the field of political controversy at the top level, the Tempe case shifts from today and for the whole week.

At the same time, both the government and the opposition parties are waiting to see if and to what extent the society’s mobilizations will continue.

Thus, the parliamentary confrontation takes place with the attention of society and the aim of gaining impressions there.

Today the proposal to set up a pre -trial for Christos Triantopoulos will be discussed.

Already by the government majority they have announced that they will accept the request. Government sources insist that Mr Triantopoulos is not in charge of the category, as there is no evidence to show that he was the one who gave orders to anything at the scene of the accident. They speak of a political expediency move on the part of the opposition, without meaningful content.

But then, from the pervasive conception of concealment, which shows according to polls being dominant in much of the citizens, the government the last thing they want is to further supply this climate.

Thus, they will accept the establishment of a pre -trial committee. As a executive of the Prime Ministerial Staff points out, “without any asterisk, no timetable, without any restrictions, as long as it is required, the pre -trial will work.” The experience of the way the Tempi Inquiry Committee has worked and the sense it left in public seems to have been embedded as a bad precedent and, in any case, the government does not want to fuel the debate on moves that favor the concealment nor to give a step and a scope to the opposition.

The prime minister will not participate in today’s debate, as this is the standard practice in similar parliamentary procedures.

Mr Mitsotakis will be in the House tomorrow, where the pre -agenda discussion on Tempe is scheduled.

The question is whether it will be done normally or whether the procedure will be interrupted because the opposition will submit a proposal for no confidence, as PASOK has announced.

The prime minister reports that Mr Mitsotakis has prepared for both possibilities. After all, even if the debate pre -agenda is made, the proposal of mistrust will follow, just with a one -day delay.

The government’s line in the battles in Parliament has been more or less determined by Mr Mitsotakis’ successive public interventions all previous days. In essence, the government seeks to appear that it fully understands the anxieties of society, that it considers the demands for justice and punishment of the accident of the accident, while at the same time suggesting the demand for safe rail movements as a critical, critical.

In these two fields he will seek in the House to pass the message that justice will work and make responsibility, while in relation to the upgrading of the railways, that it is a priority that will be implemented with a two -year period with prime ministerial commitment.

At the political level, gravity is expected to focus on the position that there has been no duties on the part of the government. That there was no government planning and orders in this direction.

EPANAAM’s finding and his references to government officials in the role of observer at the scene of the accident will be properly exploited.

The battle in the House is expected to be harsh. The government believes that they can highlight intentions and micro -political logic in opposition movements.

Regardless of the developments in Parliament and the start of the debate on the proposal of mistrust, the Prime Minister’s associates say Mr Mitsotakis will go to Brussels on Thursday for the European Summit for Ukraine.