By Antonis Antzolettos

The arrhythmias presented in PASOK and the “murmur”, albeit limited, recorded in the SYRIZA Central Committee, are the result of the democratic “cachexia” presented by both parties.

In Harilaou Trikoupi from the October intra -party elections and then things did not go as they expected.

Nikos Androulakis received a renewed mandate and, through the new split of SYRIZA, became the leader of the opposition.

An institutional role that could give PASOK a further impulse.

However, from the beginning of the year and after the numbers of Harilaou Trikoupis, they are not blooming.

The interior is now boiling and executives openly show that they question the strategy followed. Specifically, Katerina Batzeli’s referral to the discipline was considered “selective” and how two meters and two weights were observed in the party’s reflexes. It all had begun from the episode of Nikos Androulakis with Evangelia Liakoulis, and there were reactions from the renewed wing in relation to the announcements for the Sectors.

Harilaou Trikoupi is currently gathering a lot of “flammable material”, as is the issue of cooperation that Koumoundourou urges in order to push the president of the movement more.

The next meeting of the Political Center – whenever it is – is estimated to be stormy.

SYRIZA remains democratically under the “base” and this led Pavlos Polakis – five months after the intra -party elections – to launch shots at Socrates Famello.

It is clear that in Koumoundourou nothing is going well from the summer of 2023 onwards. Stefanos Kasselakis’ departure did not bring the “spring” that some were expecting and now it seems that Haniotis MPs took his “weapon”.

An indication of the climate is the disagreement Paul Polakis had with Dionysis Temponera on Saturday in the Central Committee when the former deputy minister referred to his reintegration into the Political Secretariat. “By decision of the Vassiliadis and Spirtzis, who had resigned, they returned to the positions they held in PG.

This decision was overflowed so that Temponera would return to the PG and Tzoumakas in a position in which he had not been elected, as he took Spirtz’s position when he resigned.

I say well they came back, the more the better, but they should return as simple members to their organizations, “he said.

Dionysis Temponera replied: “We resigned many months ago from the instruments and remained simple members, so as not to legitimize the” wrong “Kasselakis, as you mentioned, what you supported until the last minute. We resigned because we wanted to be consistent in our values ​​and principles and the “chair” didn’t care. On the contrary, you who say you are taking responsibility you do not do the same. You said you took responsibility. In our value code, taking responsibility means I do my self -criticism, I give up, I do aside and not to claim the presidency. ”

Will the field be conflicting from now on in SYRIZA? The “antidote” is for the party to re -re -re -establish the opposition. There are processes, but the new left are several voices that do not discuss the possibility of co -ordinating parliamentary groups with a new name that could be the composition of the two names. Keeping their offices and autonomy. The “equation” is quite difficult, though efforts will be made with some Koumoundouros executives wanting to catch up with the TIF.

PASOK and SYRIZA are at a disadvantage because of the fact that no one has a government perspective.

Harilaou Trikoupi and Koumoundourou have not at any time been able to exploit the deterioration of the government and this is concerned about potential voters.

Zoe Konstantopoulou’s poll rise with PASOK’s “overthrow” from second place in investigations has caused even more problems, as well as SYRIZA “bleeds” towards Freedom Sun.