The category of “concealment of truth” in the Tempe case was returned to the opposition parties, justice Minister George Floridis, who with the peak of objections about unconstitutional functioning of the Preliminary Inquiry Committee, argued to the contrary and attributed them “hypocrisy”.

Mr Floridis said that behind the attitude of the opposition In this case lies the substance that is none other than parties’ desire to release From this toxic story “Because after the ocean of lie it is time for truth and slowly the people will learn the truth.” “There is no way to avoid revealing the truth. And there is no way to avoid the big accusation that all that has cared for you for a year and a half was to conceal the truth and the category will be returned. “he said to the opposition seats.

He added that the debate, which was held, was not for the process, as the parties argued, because -as he underlined – There is no other way to pay the provisions of the Constitution and move on to the case further.

And accused the parties for non -existent institutional seriousnesssince their attitude was not understood by the positions of their representatives and whether they would follow the institutionally predicted procedure, that is, “If they leave in the middle, if they leave before the vote or if they stay.”

In support of his complaint of “hypocrisy”, the Minister of Justice said that their attitude was proven as they were proven as they were proven as they are They never evaluated the bulky envelope of the items delivered by the Commission to its members and including thousands of pages of witness deposits.

“You are obviously not interested in the information that exists, neither the investigation done by the prosecutor’s office, nor the material that exists and which is absolutely justified by a committee to say that if an extensive investigation has been done with so many evidence, it can be completed because its role is a role of prosecutor. And as one wrote: Do we try to understand when a prosecutor of regular justice exerts a preliminary examination process for a citizen, he humiliates the examiners and detains them? Do you imagine such a prosecutor? But here we have the prosecutor called a preliminary examination committee, where he has rushed to issue a guilt finding and at the same time there is no accusation, a slander, slander that has not been addressed by those he will consider. And do you say this institutional process?. And it is called deliberately pre -trial, the committee while it is not. He is a preliminary examination committee with the role of the prosecutor. Obviously you will never understand because you don’t want to understand.

You are ahead of the revelation of a terrible hypocrisy, which you have anyway. I realize that SYRIZA, through its democratic collapse, wants to leave him devastating embrace of conspiracy, which dismantled him as a branch of Mrs Constantopoulou. But your hypocrisy is as follows: For years both within the political system and to the people, there is a debate that we should follow a course of revision of the constitutional provisions so that politicians have the same criminal treatment with citizens. And the prime minister here opened the process. And now that the House, on the basis of the initiative of one who is accused, says that “I want to lead the constitution before the natural judges”, which is also the requirement of the citizens, you say hypocrisy “no” and ignore the envelope and evidence and witnesses. The rallies that took place, among other things, the request of the criminal use of politicians must be the same as the citizens. “ Mr. Floridis developed his reasoning.

Continuing the “indictment” against the opposition, he said that the parties are hypocritical argue that violated the Constitutionbecause the Constitution predicts exactly what they were done: composition of the committeeits meeting, the tradition of its material to justice, as the judges themselves found. “So what is the Constitution violated?” Mr. Floridis questioned and asked the question: “When the Commission was set up, he evaluated the material and decided to recommend the referral and the plenary will decide. Is there a Judicial Council that will say that two witnesses were not summoned, so the procedure is invalid when there are thousands of pages of witnessing deposits? Who are you fooling? “.

In addition, Mr Floridis responded to Zoe Konstantopoulou, who shouted to the minister from the seat that the government is not entitled to be in Parliament today.. “According to the musulinous perceptions you have, it is obviously not entitled to be the government here. But Greece does not have a Mussolinic regime, as you dream, it has democracywhich results from a government legalized in the House. We have heard you enough, you are quite a bit of humiliation. We will answer you politically » The Minister of Justice replied.