For his decision Court to cancel the election of a stigma of two other “Spartans”, resulting in Parliament to remain with 297 Membersthe government spokesman spoke Paul Marinakis speaking on his radio SKAI.

“We will have a House for the first time with 297 members. The majority goes to 149 out of 151 ‘, Mr. Marinakis pointed out. “The decision is the decision of the Justice, not the government. The House through the government’s legal initiative over the past four years has given the opportunity to justice and this is a loud response to those who at times say Mitsotakis is winking at the far right. “

“Let’s say that what is regarded as a dumbness is not one’s ideology, no matter how disgusting it is, but its criminal activity in fact, that is, the leader,” added. “Legal reality arises from court rulings. “

To a question as to whether the number of 151 Members remain in view of pre -trial for the Tempi And if a stated issue arises, the government spokesman replied:

“Typically the House will adapt to the new reality. But for us the bar is not 149 or 151. I do not believe that there is a Member of our own line that he will not accept and will not vote for Mr Karamanlis to be judged by the natural judge. “

‘Automated sentence in basketball’

With reference to the new season at basketball data and episode In the order of them Greek finals between Olympic and Panathinaicunderlined the following:

“1.5 years ago we had moved on to a series of measures on the stadiums, such as entry identification, cameras and automated penalties. We have seen that the more the human factor and the subjective crisis diminishes, the more effective we are. Flash on the stadium – 1 race, 2nd time – 2 races. And just the committee responsible is finding it. “

“Let’s go to basketball now. The government cannot even impose penalties – it is not athletic justice – nor can it decide whether a refereeing is good or bad. The government saw last week that there was a very high risk of escaping the situation and this was a risk for people going to the stadium. That is why there was an intervention to ensure the smooth conduct of the matches, which happened. But there is another danger that is raising and has to do with players or players’ behaviors. “

“To tell you what we can do and what not. We cannot decide A or B punishment. Punishments are administrative decisions that are the result of judges. No government can intervene in the world. But what can we do? Taking as an example, what worked on the stadiums in the security and punishment of fans or administrative actors, based on the logic of the automated penalty, we want to extend this to the disciplinary context of a struggle. That is, Yiannis Broutsis processes a framework for amending the law and to increase the logic of the automated sentence much more. The one has the power to impose a penalty and to find in many more cases what happened. If they become specific gestures, for example, then we will have 1 race, 2 races, etc. The right thing is in a bad behavior individual, and the punishment is individual. “