SYRIZA’s decision not to participate in the pre -trial vote if the way the conference of the Presidents of the House has chosen was not changed, the party’s President, Socrates Famellos, expressed in his statements.

Speaking to the “Parapolitika FM” radio, he said: “MPs must vote by offense and by person and not by a person as a whole of each party’s proposal. There is a approach from the Presidents’ Conference that MPs do not choose what offenses should be checked but for which persons on the basis of the party’s proposal. They will make us choose whether MPs agree on the party’s proposal as a whole. We will put an issue from the first moment on the process. ” Overall he said there is a risk of amnesty.

On the post of SYRIZA, he emphasized as a whole: “The proposal for the pre -trial committee was started by Mr. Androulakis without consultation. We, with the new left, started the discussion on a joint proposal and stopped when Mr Mitsotakis’ name came in. ” He attributed the disagreement to the new Left in the prevailing views that do not want cooperation with SYRIZA. He also noted that “in SYRIZA we came to a proposal that does not have the offenses of the proposal signed by the Greek solution and the cruise”.

He then referred to the SYRIZA conference in relation to the extensive debate on “Alexis Tsipras’ new party”. Mr. Famellos emphasized: ‘We made a successful conference that we made useful conclusions. What matters to the country is to have a progressive response to the Mitsotakis government that can also be made by a government proposal. We all agree on this. And Alexis Tsipras has been placed for the need for a progressive proposal. The discussions that open on the occasion of cases do not know if they do good. SYRIZA decided to be the trunk of the progressive response and we all agreed by Alexis Tsipras. SYRIZA has chosen to be that catalyst and accelerator to form the progressive proposal. I will not judge one by one the statements of our Members. Alexis Tsipras has not opened the debate on a new party, he has opened the debate that there is a progressive way out. The question is why there is no cooperation from the other parties from PASOK and Nikos Androulakis and the New Left” He noted, however, that Mr Androulakis’ position on autonomous course is contrary to the will of the majority of “progressive citizens”.

To the question “Who will you work with?”, Given that the other parties refuse, he replied: “The question is why Mr Androulakis refuses and why the new left is denied. The proposal of partnerships is the proposal that the social majority wants. There has been a view on the new left that is against partnerships. When someone is forced to find disagreements then you do not want cooperation. We in SYRIZA leave the past behind. “

Mr. Famellos noted that “On the issue of submitting a proposal for the pre -trial investigation I personally discussed with Zoe Konstantopoulou. But in general, her party has not clarified its mark and if it supports progressive policies. There is no question of program cooperation. “

By doing self -criticism, he said that the Kasselaki period was made a lot of mistakes and added that “it is not at all easy to expel the shadow of the Kasselaki period“

In closing, the SYRIZA president emphasized the need for a different redistribution of income that faces the great asymmetry between the shares of work and the great wealth. He emphasized: “There is a devastating choice by Kyriakos Mitsotakis for the benefit of profits. And at the level of investment we do not have investments that increase productivity but increase the balance in the balance. With the surpluses that have gathered to become a new National Recovery Fund for SMEs and Mortgage Policy. “