By Gifts Antoniou

Before the European Public Prosecutor’s Office for OPEKEPE, which concerns Maki Voridis and Lefteris Avgenakis, is well -prescribed to the House, a field of tough political controversy is prescribed, again in question of investigating the responsibilities of the two politicians. Officially all sides – government and opposition parties – say they are waiting for the case file to study its content and decide how to move.

However, the strategy has begun to be engraved and a sample of writing the approach will be adopted. On the part of the government, they are patience until we see what the specific references to the two politicians in this case file are. At the same time, they leave the fact that before the case file came to Parliament, the two names were announced, and journalistic information on the content of the case file is also being moved.

The dissatisfaction with the disclosure of only two names is probably linked to another option that has made it clear that the government majority is making for this case: it liabetic and the narrative that OPECEPE’s sinful story exceeds ND’s government life And by extension everyone knew and to some extent they have a responsibility that have tolerated this situation.

A narrative enriched with reports and earlier scandalous cases related to agricultural aid and European funding. What they imply from the government is that the case file is probably included in other names that justify the line they adopt. It remains to be seen in the next few days whether this estimate will be justified.

In any case, it is clear that the heavy climate of investigating a case with judicial implications returns to the House. And the mission of the case file is utilized by the opposition, in order to restore the complainant to the government’s actions, with references to scandal dominating.

PASOK states that, if the information seeing the light of publicity is confirmed and if the data presented in the media are actually included in the case file, then the case concerns crimes for the two ministers involved. And herald that they will use all the available parliamentary media.

Probably the submission of a proposal for examination or even pre -trial should be discounted. After all, the opposition party has the number of MPs needed to make such moves in Parliament alone, while at the same time, Harilaou Trikoupi’s belief that the party is strengthened by such interventions.

It is indicative in this context Dimitris Mantzou’s statement to SKAI that “The PASOK – Change Movement has proven at least three times, on the occasion of the tragic criminal crash in Tempe, that it is aware of studying the files and taking parliamentary initiatives it needs at the legal level. We will do the same for OPEKEPE »

The conflict yesterday between the Minister of Rural Development and Food, Costas Tsiara, and Harilaou Trikoupi is indicative of the confrontation that we should expect to be unleashed soon. Mr. Tsiaras, speaking to SKAIcalled Nikos Androulakis “To look close to people in relation to what participation may have on all these issues and in the formation of issues.”a statement that brought PASOK’s angry reaction, which talked about ‘Vulgar hints’. Sources of the opposition party party rushed to comment that “Nikos Androulakis, nor his environment, has nothing to fear. Does the Minister of Rural Development threaten, blackmail? What is he doing?. We are not delicious blackmail. ”