A fierce conflict between the New Democracy and the PASOK-KINAL was prompted by the announcement of the ruling party involved in major opposition official Nikos Bounakis in the OPECEPE case.

The ND announcement sparked PASOK’s strong reaction. The company also made a statement on the issue by Proactive Business SA, which is Mr Bounakis. The intervention on the subject was made through X and Haris Doukas. If there is a responsibility for any of our executives in the agricultural scandals, the only way is to delete, the mayor of Athens clarifies.

‘Truth should shine as hard as it is’

Shocked by the public confession of Mr Nikos Bounakis, a former PASOK-KINAL Heraklion MP and today Deputy Agricultural Development & Food, a close friend and associate of Mr. Nikos Androulakis, in the central newsletter On Lake Carla!

At a time when PASOK and other opposition parties accuse the government of the so -called “scandal” in OPEKEPE, an important PASOK official in Crete is absolutely involved as the owner of the KYD, declaring public land at Lake Carla in Thessaly in Thessaly.

The PASOK executive involved in the case has to explain a number of issues:

How many years have been reported by the acres of land in Thessaly by farmers who had nothing to do with the area?

How much money has they received in total?

Why did he not do anything to prevent illegality?

Is PASOK, agreeing with the actions of its Deputy Secretary in the field of agricultural policy?

We look forward to the apology of the opposition and personally of PASOK – KINAL President Nikos Androulakis.

The rest in the Inquiry Committee in Parliament from next Tuesday.

The truth should shine, no matter how hard it is.
Share Tweet Print
“Mr. Bunakis is at the disposal of anyone”

“My old art sieve, but the political scams for the sake of antigontics do not cut tickets, gentlemen of New Democracy” replies PASOK

The government that protected its ministers from investigating justice by tooling its parliamentary majority and is afraid to invite Mr Mylonakis and the protagonists of the corruption scandal such as “Frape”, “Hassapi”, the “Hassapi”, the tutor.

Who do they want to cover? Is the real orchestrator of the scandal? Is it the leadership of the Maximus Grand, which seems to have been involved*? *Is the Prime Minister himself, who while his close associates know everything, he does again … Him?
It is such a political boldness that in their announcement they reflect the word scandal in quotes. That is to say, they are a scandal, what the European Prosecutor called as the acronym of corruption, nepotism and customer base.

Following the detailed explanations of Mr Bunakis, which rejects the New Democracy propaganda, they will not avoid apology for how the scandal has flourished in OPECEPE from 2019 until today.

On Tuesday, at the next meeting of the Inquiry Committee, we expect the majority of New Democracy to immediately invite its MP, Mr Boukoros, who deal with Lake Carla. Mr. Bunakis, after all, is at the disposal of anyone.

We also expect to give all the “sinful” VAT IDs related to illegal subsidies.

We imagine that none of the above will deny the majority of the New Democracy in the Inquiry Committee, because they have nothing … to hide (!). We inform them that despite the cheap antiseptics and mud, PASOK will continue to reveal all aspects of the scandal, trying to “hide”.

‘Murder of Character’

Proactive SA-compliars company is referring to a “murder of character” in a statement.

In recent days, a miserable mud and slander has peaked at the expense of our company and Managing Director, Nikos Bounakis.

From the first days of the publicity of the OPEKEPE scandal – and in particular after an investigation by European prosecutors – the well -known circles in an effort to disseminate responsibilities are leaking into the media whispers for our company involvement.
Today, the seeds and hoodlums were revealed.

Surprisingly, we read a statement from the New Democracy citing media reports about a IACS statement of a producer who had been submitted through our company’s reception center and concerns a parcel rented in the lowland area around Lake Karla about 330 acres.

On the occasion of this statement by the producer, a huge misinformation and murder operation was implemented. Today we read on a variety of sites that the CEO of our company has stated ten times the extent that is 3,500 acres on Lake Carla !!!!

What is the truth:

But the truth is completely different. The producer with all its supporting documents to be submitted through the application of the IACS (Integrated Management and Control System) to OPECEPE for aid which she identified in her application as a beneficiary, already holds rights for the years 2022-2023, came to the Center for Record of our Company with all its supporting documents.

Among the documents he filed to accept the request to OPEKEPE at our center was an already associated and registered real estate lease at the Independent Public Revenue Authority (AADE). *The lease she provided herself included all the information necessary to be registered in the OPEKEPE system, such as a name, surname and employee and lessor, property ID number (ATAK). The result of this registration where all the necessary information was stated, which has been accepted by OPEKEPE, was both the payment of both years to the producer, with no problem being rejected.

From what we have exposed, the New Democracy factors that are misinformed should tell us where it is clear that our company is involved in the producer’s statement of the parcel.

Are they trying to offset organized processes of producing hundreds of pasture documents from well -known statements centers that have been employed and concerned with justice and are in the case file*? *The filing centers have neither jurisdiction nor the ability to control the legality of the lease issued by the AADE or other information provided by the producers and which are accepted by the IACS, are controlled and paid by OPECEPE, as in the producer.

If the parcel was or is public, then why did AADE first pointed out to the individual who registered that he owns it in his property as a privately owned and even after the registration of the property was issued and a number of property ID (ATAK)?

Why did the IACS system not pointed out as in other cases that it was a public extent so as not to allow it to be declared by the producer?
Why was this not identified by OPEKEPE and were the aid to the producer who applied for them without any problems with the activation of the rights he owned?

From all of the above, and the most unsuspecting may realize that *a miserable mud and slander has been orchestrated at the expense of our company, on the one hand to blur the waters and to turn the spotlight by the real guards of the scandal and the community to Interests on the part of the New Democracy.

Our company and I personally will bring to justice in the coming days to defend ourselves against defamation and slander.

A little shame. Enough..