THE OFI got a great “double” (1-2) on it AEK, leaving the “Union” at -11 from the top, while at the same time continuing the curse that wants her to have to win her last game before Christmas from afar 2008.
However, no “malice” is due to tragic defensive reactions of AEK in another match this year, which “shout” for work and transfer aid, especially in χαφ! At the same time, the OFI coach -who remains in the six-, Nikos Nioplias, presented exceptionally read.
In detail, the key points from the match according to the “coach of the podium”:
-The tragic defensive reactions of AEK: OFI’s draw phase starts with the “sale” of the ball by Simoes. Bad; Bad… But also human. What is not allowed is the subsequent reaction of the “Union”, with its remnants leaving… airstrip to OLOMONACHOS Lambrou, after the shooting of Marinakis, in order for him to come down, to control and to execute. In the 1-2 AEK defenders and midfielders ran in … nowhere, Vranjes “ate” a dribble and had a misplaced tackle on the caps, while Hadjisafi (who is the truth that he stood very well in the previous games) had a very bad reaction to the marking of Kamau.
In a match that the team of Argyrgis Giannikis had unacceptable returns and generally reactions to its defensive transitions. Which is its biggest problem this year. No curse is to blame for this. Only with work but also the right players is corrected.
-The well-known problem in the midfield: AEK need half. It is constantly highlighted. And how can this not happen, when it is something that, with the exception of the previous four games, costs the “Union” in almost every game. Against OFI it cost so much inhibitory level -as noted in the above-mentioned part- with the obvious absence of speed and correct returns but also in the closing of the spaces, as well as in creative. Although Sachhoff has development as a strength behind him, the duo with Simoes did not work at all, nor in this area. Even in the intervals (mainly in the first half) when AEK created opportunities, their contribution to them was minimal. The “biceps” could not develop from the axis and find corridors, so it resorted several times to fillings.
Could not take advantage of her momentum: It was noted, after its previous games, that AEK in some matches is not cynical. For example, with Ionikos, he could have cleared the match faster. Thus, against OFI, he created phases, after 1-0, which he did not take advantage of. In one of them he asked for a penalty, of course (quite a difficult phase).
-The read Nioplias: Did AEK have tragic reactions? Yes, but that alone is not enough for the opponent to take advantage of it. OFI coach Nikos Nioplias seemed extremely well-read, which was reflected in the two goals scored by his team, but mainly in the other phases of his team, which gave the “Union” a headache where it hurts, in the defensive transitions.
-Better for AEK, Vranies to offer mainly for what… is paid: With the goal he scored, the Bosnian stopper reached three in the season. It is great to have a central defender in your team who can contribute to scoring. The main thing, however, is to do the job, which ανα states his football identity: To defend properly! Something that Vranies did not do in either of the two phases in the goals conceded by AEK, at the moment that he has given similar rights with his other appearances this year.
Follow News Bulletin 247 on Google News to be the first to hear the latest news .
Chad-98Weaver, a distinguished author at NewsBulletin247, excels in the craft of article writing. With a keen eye for detail and a penchant for storytelling, Chad delivers informative and engaging content that resonates with readers across various subjects. His contributions are a testament to his dedication and expertise in the field of journalism.
