For spikes left by Panathinaikosregarding the matter Carlitosplaced o Yannis Karalis.
After suspension of the “greens”, in which they expressed the question them for the fact that the Spaniard was declared to serve a suspension in the match with the AEKthe communication director of the yellow and black PAE he answered with his own post on social media.
In it he mentions specifically:
“Because crossing the limits is considered by some to be a piece of cake…
Why is it correct and logical in football terms not to declare a Lamia player with cards in the match with AEK and to declare in another match?
By what criteria do we see teams outside the top five making these choices so far? Do they make them play the title contenders and let them languish in other matches?
Are there – since the conversation brought it up – other very important players from the same team who have cards, will play with AEK and have registered for the match with PAOK? There are, is the answer…
Do the propagandists think it makes more sense to declare Lamia’s main player with Atromitos who is theoretically the most passable of the three matches he has to play until the end?
With the opportunity to sit and see in general how many cases and how many key players who have cards, have been declared by teams outside the top 5 in matches with title contenders (and especially by Lamia in matches with AEK’s competitors for the title );
You will be embarrassed (?) if you sit down and record them. Repent with your wretchedness now…”
Source: Sport Fm
I am currently a news writer for News Bulletin247 where I mostly cover sports news. I have always been interested in writing and it is something I am very passionate about. In my spare time, I enjoy reading and spending time with my family and friends.
