Koutsis in the trial: “Almeida’s AEK, he underestimated his players in the match with Olympiacos”

George Koutsis spoke about the image of the teams claiming the title, the overthrow of PAOK, the possible retirement and the arbitration in the “trial in SKAI”.

For arbitration: “VAR is a tool that helps. The new technology helps us but football is becoming something easier and we see that they are trying to get something. I hope to see excellent arbitrations in the games. We need to look at the referees’ behaviors. No referee has told me sorry I was wrong. Referees’ decisions affect our work. 80 to 90% are on the pitch as if it are who. They must have a more earthy behavior. “

To overthrow PAOK in the match with AEK: “In the first half the protagonist was one and didn’t go through your mind that the winner would be another. However, we see that after the 60th AEK has an anarchic game and a fatigue. Something is wrong with planning. He has great players. Some failure has been done and we see this result. Almeida is responsible. It is not the only game we see AEK crawling, tired, not having energy and confidence after 69-65. We have to dwell on the fact that in both games of the first game we saw goals, good actions and football was attractive. “

For the second -place battle: “Based on the image of the teams I would say PAOK. The overthrow of a difficult headquarters combined with his image I think is one of the favorites. Panathinaikos comes out of a reaction, you see a atrocity. I don’t see anything that convinces me that it is a team that its image will improve and get the results it needs. The battle for second place will be interesting. “

For AEK and a possible withdrawal of Almeida: “AEK has an additional weight, this psychic, this challenge it receives from its world. What hurts AEK the most is that Almeida threshing the team in the way he presented the team in the game with Olympiacos. Depressed his team and his players. This annoyed the AEK organization. It doesn’t take the picture that I will win. There is a doubt that is broadcast and decisions are confused. Almeida’s departure would not benefit at this time. He has made his circle I think. ”

For Lutsescu: “Lutsescu should not change. He has not yet completed his cycle. If they become better and apt choices will become stronger. Is it good why to change him? His way of working. “

For Vitoria: “It will take time to judge.”