The International Atomic Energy Organization should put its nuclear weapons under its supervision Pakistanthe Minister of Defense said today India Radznath Singh, a few days after the end of the worst military conflict between the two nuclear forces over almost three decades.

Murdering battles broke out between the two countries last week after India hit “terrorist camps” as he says in Pakistan in retaliation for an attack on Indian cashmere last month that cost the lives of 26 tourists and which he says was claimed by Pakistan.

Islamabad denied allegations and the two countries sent rockets and unmanned air vehicles (drones) to the other’s airspace in the days that followed, before a truce on Saturday, May 10th.

“Are the nuclear weapons safe in the hands of such an irresponsible and dangerous nation?” said Singh, addressing soldiers in the summer capital of the Indian Kashmir Srinagar. “I believe that Pakistan’s nuclear weapons must be put under the supervision of the IAEA.”

Pakistan has condemned these statements, adding in a statement that “if they should be worried, then the IAEA and the international community must do so [να ανησυχούν] For repeated thefts and incidents associated with the trade of nuclear and radioactive material in India. “

The Foreign Ministry then referred to events that occurred in 2021 and “indicate that there is a black market for sensitive and dual -use materials in India”. Requested a “thorough research” on this issue. Categories that India has not commented so far.

In a post on the X platform, the Pakistani Foreign Ministry also argued that Indian Foreign Minister statements show India’s “insecurity and despair” for “effective defense and deterrence (Pakistan) against Indian aggression through conventional media”.

IAEA (IAEA, the English acronym) is a Vienna -based UN -based service that oversees nuclear programs to ensure that they are peaceful. The IAEE oversees several Indian nuclear power facilities for non -military purposes under a 2008 agreement.

India and Pakistan became nuclear forces after nuclear tests in 1998 and their decades of hostility that made the region-the most crowded in the world-one of the most dangerous nuclear ignition points.

The most recent military conflict between the two neighboring South Asia countries escalated on Saturday, and there were fears for a while that the nuclear arsenals would go into the game, as the Pakistani army said that the highest body was supervised.

But the Pakistani Defense Minister said such a meeting had not been planned.

Military analysts said this might have been Pakistan’s way to imply that he has the nuclear choice as Islamabad pursues a “first -use” policy[πυρηνικών όπλων] Since its existence is threatened with a conflict – which means that Pakistan can carry out a preventive nuclear blow to an enemy even if it has not been attacked by nuclear weapons of this enemy.

“I hope I’m not going out here in two days … To find out that it has not been settled, but I think it has been settled and we talked to them about trade, let’s trade instead of war,” US President Donald Trump told US troops.

Trump was the first to announce the ceasefire on Saturday, which suggests that he was achieved as a result of diplomacy and pressure in Washington.

Pakistan thanked Washington for her involvement, but the Foreign Ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comments about his latest statement.

There is no new answer either from New Delhi today. The Indian Foreign Ministry said earlier this week that the issue of trade was not raised in talks with Washington and that the agreement to stop hostilities was achieved directly with Islamabad.

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Monty said Monday that India would hit terrorist hideouts along the border again if new attacks on its territory occur and that it would not be prevented from Islamabad’s “nuclear blackmail”.

Pakistan described Monty’s statements as “provocative and incendiary claims”, saying they were a dangerous escalation.

The main Hindu India and the Muslim Pakistan have fought three times in the past, the two for the Kashmir region in the Himalayas, which they both claim in its entirety but rule a part of it.

India also accuses Pakistan of supporting Islamist fighters who are fighting for security forces in its own part of Kashmir, but Islamabad denies the charge.