The tranquility returned yesterday, Tuesday, to Los Angeles, where Mayor Karen Bass decided to lift the nightlife ban imposed a week ago, while California Governor Gavin Newsom is trying to regain control of the city. for his immigration policy.

A wave of arrests of irregular migrants by the ICE service caused the indignation of a portion of the Los Angeles residents. Demonstrations against these operations have led to the outbreak of sporadic riots and incidents.

Trump hastened to accuse local authorities, who belong to the Democratic Party, of losing control of the city and sent 4,000 members of the National Guard as well as 700 Marines in Los Angeles.

This decision by the US president was strongly criticized by both Newsom and Bas, who accused him of tooling the situation.

Despite the impressive images of taxis-robots burning, despite looting and clashes with police, the incidents were confined to some areas of the center of Los Angeles.

Karen Bass imposed a night traffic ban on June 10, about 13 square kilometers.

This measure “contributed greatly to the protection of shops, restaurants, businesses and homes from evil elements,” the Democratic Mayor said yesterday, announcing its lifting.

From the weekend, when the “No Kings” (not kings) march with the participation of thousands of people took place, the tension has fallen to Los Angeles.

But Bas said ready to “restore” the ban on traffic if needed.

Exercising the federal authorities’ operations against irregular immigrants to Los Angeles, Trump attacked California, a state of refuge for those who do not have legal documents and living in a large number of immigrants.

His decision to develop the National Guard without the agreement of the State Governor is something that has never happened in 1965.

Gavin Newsom criticized the authoritarian tendencies of the US president and addressed justice to regain control of the situation.

Last week, a federal judge justified him, considering that the development of National Guard in Los Angeles was illegal and that the violent incidents, confined to some building blocks, had nothing to do with the “uprising” cited by the federal government.

But the implementation of this decision has been frozen, as the US Ministry of Justice appealed, which began to be heard yesterday, Tuesday, at the San Francisco Court of Appeal.

During the hearing, justice ministry spokesman Brett Sumeit estimated that “members of the National Guard are essential” in Los Angeles.

Their mission is “to protect federal buildings from new violations and violent riots using fireworks, Molotov bombs and the elimination of ICE cement parties”, he insisted.

For his part, Samuel Harburt, who represented the state of California, estimated that local class forces are “doing their job” and managing the situation.

Los Angeles police have made nearly 600 arrests since the beginning of the demonstrations and yesterday the local prosecutor announced the prosecution of about 30 people.

In these conditions, the development of the National Guard is “an extreme measure” and unjustified, Harburt stressed. It threatens to “worsen the tension even further and increase the risk of violence in the city of Los Angeles”.

The decision of the Court of Appeal is expected in the coming days and is estimated to have a significant impact on the power of a US president to develop the army on US territory, with the case likely to reach the Supreme Court.

“I am convinced that logic will prevail,” Newsom said in a statement. “The position of the US Army is on the battlefield, not on the US roads.”