Colombian Supreme Court ruled that Meta violated the right to freedom of pornstar expression Esperanza gómezdeleting her Instagram account “without clear and clear justification” and without dealing with other similar accounts in the same way.
See this post on Instagram.
The 45 -year -old, with over five million followers, is one of the most well -known porn stars in Colombia.
Meta had argued that the Gómez He violated the rules of the community on nude, but has not yet commented on the court’s ruling.
She had complained that the deletion of her account influenced her professional activity. He also stressed that Meta did not follow the procedure.
The Court recognized the need for social networking platforms to control the content, but stressed that this does not justify the closure of a user account that is employed as a pornstar, without clear and transparent justification.
See this post on Instagram.
At the same time, he found that Meta “applied the rules for naked and sexual services”, as other accounts with similar content remained active.
OR Meta It is called upon to review and adapt the Terms of Use and Instagram Privacy Policy so that users can clearly and accurately know the rules for the implied sexual content.
Penalties were not determined in the event of non -compliance or compensation for Gómez. This is not the first time a court in Latin America has obliged a social network to change policies.
In Brazil, the Supreme Court had ruled that social networks were responsible for illegal content, including rhetorical hatred, and must remove it immediately.
See this post on Instagram.
Source :Skai
With a wealth of experience honed over 4+ years in journalism, I bring a seasoned voice to the world of news. Currently, I work as a freelance writer and editor, always seeking new opportunities to tell compelling stories in the field of world news.
