US President Donald Trump’s official visit to the United Kingdom was commented in a variety of ways: historical, unprecedented, unique. And while the adjectives are often used to add some exaggeration, in this case it was necessary to present exactly what happened. The British government knew the impact that the visit would have for it used the invitation as a “pride” to Trump.

As an American source told London’s Times, “you gave him a piece of history as the first president to made two official visits to the head of state” while Trump told his guests at the Windsor dinner that he hoped to be the last one.

‘Breath’ of the Labor Government with the technological investment of billions

Thus, Britain’s “plan” seems to have succeeded and as “by magic” everything went well. This is the main conclusion one will draw either read the titles of the British newspapers or deepen the next day’s analysis articles.

For starters, Downing Street spoke of diplomatic success and today appears happy and relieved. At the same time, there is a reference to the push of the star leadership, as although the two leaders have several different political views, it seems that Trump has a particular sympathy and respect for the British prime minister.

This is proven in practice by the technological agreement that has managed to secure. As it became known yesterday, the United Kingdom “gave hands” with US companies for investment to the country, in £ 150 billion. The US – UK Technology Prosperity Deal agreement is expected to open thousands of new jobs, “unravel” Britain from the financial straits it is located and to help the two countries “dominate the future of artificial intelligence”.

Migration, Palestine, Environment The basic “thorns”

And while, as the two leaders pointed out, their countries maintain a “separate bond”, the disagreements were there. Initially, Donald Trump made up a strict tone for immigration, urging the British prime minister to use the army to tackle illegal immigration that “destroys countries from the inside”, as he characteristically said.

At the same time, as a well -known critic of the null agenda agenda, he proposed to Starmer to drill oil in the North Sea and abandon the wind farms that he described as “devastating and precise ridiculousness”.

Finally, on the issue of the forthcoming recognition of the Palestinian state by the British government, President Trump made it clear that he “disagrees” without further commenting on the issue.

However, analysts ask the question of whether the positive relationship between the two leaders will continue as the US president’s unpredictable behavior is known.