Novartis case: Audio documents announced by Sabi Mionis

by

The announcement of the businessman through his attorney after the prosecutor’s proposal for acquittal of Mr. Papagelopoulos

By Ioanna Mandrou

New elementsincluding audio material the businessman announces in advance Sambi Mioni that he will testify before the Judicial Council whose members are expected to issue the their opinion on the Nobartis casestarring the former Deputy Minister of Justice, Dimitris Papagelopoulos.

Mr. Mionis, through his attorney Petrou Pantazi After the submission of the prosecutor’s proposal to the judicial council, on the basis of which it is proposed the acquittal of Mr. Papagelopoulos for all the criminal acts that he had complained to the judicial authorities, he states in his announcement the following:

“To my surprise, I was informed of the content of the proposal of the Prosecutor Ms. Metsoviti – Flouri, regarding the non-referral of Dim. Papagelopoulos and his associates, for the crime of my attempted blackmail and bribery. The Public Prosecutor, with her proposal not to proceed with the investigation of the case before the court, raises serious questions and queries, both for her reasoning and for the conclusion she reaches.

First: How is it possible to bypass the indisputable, even by Papagelopoulos himself, fact that, during the meeting that took place at the Maximos Palace on March 10, 2016, the then Minister against Corruption (!), asked me to pay the “expenses” of the publisher Filippakis;

Second: How can I believe that the Prosecutor’s Office showed the attention it deserved, for accusations of this nature and seriousness, when “turned” the meeting that took place at the Maximos Palace between Papagelopoulos, Pappas and me, into a supposedly “innocent” meeting between me and Filippakis, Papagelopoulos and Tarka, to resolve a supposedly “private dispute”; How can this error and sloppiness be explained? Didn’t he read my lawsuit? Didn’t he read my memos? Did not read the apologies of the accused?

Third: How is it possible not to make, in the Prosecutorial proposal, the slightest reference to my conversation with the then Minister of State Nikos Pappas, in which the minister refers to “shops” and “people who make a lot of money” from these “shops” , obviously through illegal methods? In the light of the discussion at the Maximos Palace, to whom was the then Minister of State referring, if not to the accused Papagelopoulos?

Fourth: How can the Prosecutor say that my Israeli lawyers “do not confirm my blackmail”, when there is an affidavit of my lawyer in the case file, Mr Yuval Sasson, who fully confirmed the my attempted blackmail; Ms. did not see / read his testimony. Prosecutor; And if not, why not?

Fifth: How is it possible to the unprecedented private contract-Roadmap, signed by Filippakis and Tarka, is completely and without any reason silenced, stating that the object of the agreement is the “closure” of my tax and criminal cases, which they themselves had created, through anonymous and anonymous complaints, but also their affidavits against me and (my collaborators? How could they, ordinary journalists, “close” criminal cases, which they themselves created? Where did they get this power from, if not from the accused Papagelopoulos?

It is, in my opinion, really impressive, that the Prosecutor’s official, in just a few days, managed to study a case file of thousands of pages, concluding that the above indisputable facts do not even need further evaluation by the Greek Justice! It is also at least paradoxical that Prosecution proposal is in complete contradiction with the indictment, compiled by the experienced Mrs. Investigator, studying this case exclusively in depth of two years, receiving dozens of testimonies and reviewing thousands of documents!

In my last attempt to ask Justice to clarify this case in depth, I will immediately file a memorandum before the Judicial Council, with new evidence, including audio material, from which there will no longer be any doubt at all as to what really happened. And I will do this, with the sole purpose of finally stopping, as a society, from being surprised by “journalists” and “publishers” owning property in Monaco, Paris and Miami and gold bars in their lockers.

In a country where a Supreme Court Prosecutor considers that there is not even “sufficient evidence of guilt” to refer defendants, journalists and politicians to extortion, because soon a successful businessman can not be blackmailed (!!), he will never be found no one to denounce them anymore … The blackmailers will know that they can act and sleep peacefully …

SAMPY MIONIS
(Through the power of attorney of Lawyer PETROS PANTAZIS) “.

You May Also Like

Recommended for you