Death of three children: Coroner Tsiola answers the case

Reporting: Makis Synodinos

Through her lawyer Yannis Apatsidis, the medical examiner responds Angeliki Tsiola for the deaths of the three girls from Patra, Irida, Malena and Georgina.

Mrs. Tsiola in a long announcement talks about everyone and everything. She describes the moves she made herself, for her honor and reputation, while also leaving tips on what elements of the much-lauded case have been leaked to the media.

He also disputes the evidence and the findings of the medical examiners Karakoukis – Kalogria, as he claims that the findings they have identified are not confirmed by the autopsy.

Specifically it states:

“Representing the Coroner and Head of the Forensic Service of Patras, Mrs. Angeliki Tsiola, and following her order, to protect the Prestige of the Forensic Services of the State, as well as her Honor and Responsibility, with the selective channeling of confidential information to selected M.M. .E., the following are highlighted:

1st In regards to the forensic investigation into the causes of death of Iris D., the Medical Examiner, Mrs. Tsiola, prepared her forensic report, having previously ordered full laboratory tests, including the patho-anatomical examination, carried out by Mrs. Antigoni Mitselos. The Coroner included, in her forensic report, all the findings that she identified, after a thorough investigation, on which the Authorities relied, so that, with the combined study of all three deaths of the three children, which was carried out later, they could draw any critical conclusions.

2nd The Medical Examiner, Mrs. Tsiola, the first one, aware of her responsibility as an official, but also as a Human being, with her verbal and written requests to the competent Prosecuting Authorities, requested the combined study of the three deaths, always with the aim of finding the Truth, which is based on scientific, but also pre-investigative data.

3rd The Medical Examiner asked to be summoned to be examined under oath, based on her findings, and testified about it to the Homicide Prosecution Department, before the operation of the “finding” of her expert colleagues. Her affidavit includes all the true scientific facts and data, which will assist the competent Prosecuting Authorities, to decide on the matter.

4th What evidence has been leaked to date, regarding the findings of her Expert colleagues, in violation of judicial confidentiality, by those responsible for such leaks, and if these findings are indeed true, they are in no way confirmed by the autopsy-necrotomy, and are exclusive competence of the Prosecuting and Judicial Authorities, to evaluate the scientific and pre-investigative evidence of the case file, and to decide on it.

5th The Medical Examiner never felt the need to leak her findings to the Media, as it is the exclusive prerogative of the Prosecution and Judicial Authorities to adopt her own findings and findings, or those of her fellow Experts . The forensic investigation of the incidents in question was very difficult, and certainly the scientific conclusions are not allowed to be based on untrue findings, not at all justified, just to satisfy, simplistically, the desired result, which, however, must be scientifically documented. With a particularly painstaking investigation, the competent Medical Examiner collected all the evidence, including evidence of serous blood, i.e. fluid mixed with blood, with all that this entails, to document the pulmonary edema, and the strong possibility of asphyxiation, which the herself, alone, asked to be duly considered.

6th The channeling to M.M.E. of false evidence, certainly does not help to find the Truth, but on the contrary reinforces the Psychology of the Mass, in which the Medical Examiner never participated, knowing that scientific data and scientific truth are judged exclusively by the Courts, which are the only competent to evaluate the elements of the case file and to decide sovereignly, within the framework of their duties.

7th The unimaginable channeling in the M.M.E. that a disciplinary and/or prosecutorial investigation is being conducted or will be conducted against the Medical Examiners, who were responsible for the forensic investigation of the first two deaths, which, in fact, was allegedly assigned to a colleague with an already expressed scientific opinion, with what this means, and since it is always valid, it offends the Rule of Law and ends up adopting opinions about the scientific Middle Ages, since no Medical Examiner, and/or Prosecutor / Judicial Officer can be subject to disciplinary control for his scientific opinion, which is preferentially adopted by the competent authorities Judicial Authorities, unless his scientific opinion is knowingly false. The Medical Examiner of Patras, in contrast to her other colleagues, has never been checked even for her untrue opinions, which resulted in the cover-up of very serious crimes. That is why it has always been and remains at the disposal of the competent Authorities, for the emergence of the Truth. Udolos, however, chooses the path of public confrontation with her colleagues, since such a thing would seriously damage the Prestige of the Forensic Service, but declares in all tones that she will not tolerate future leaks that affect the Truth and her Personality, either informal, or at the trial of itinerant medical examiners, who seek publicity and acclaim, through the discrediting of the State’s Forensic Services.”

View the news feed and get the latest news.