“Today we have submitted a proposal for investigative actions that, in our appreciation, must be executed to distinguish the truth“The lawyer who represents the family, Vasilis Kalogirou, said in a statement.

In the announcement it is added that ‘Fraction for the requests we submitted and we will submit provide the questions that arise about the disappearance and then find the body“

In detail the 24 questions arising in accordance with the announcement:

  1. Vasilis was 18 kilometers from his residence in Larissa, at a hill and the slope of the ground is uphill. How could he get there on his own and not see him from farmers, breeders and those who mediate?
  2. How is it justified to pass through all the farms and facilities that are mediated, which are enclosed both externally and internally, without perceived or being attacked by the dogs that guard those sites?
  3. How is it justified to pass through the farms and crops in the area, fenced, and its clothes and shoes look intact by its passage, as the ground was wet and the area full of mud and in some places it was not accessible?
  4. How is it justified that he has remained on the spot for 45 days and the workers in the similar livestock unit have not identified him, as his point of finding was visible from the livestock unit?
  5. How is it justified at the same time that his body has not been identified, as the skull area had been attacked by birds that brought the skull to the situation in which it was found?
  6. How is it justified by the dogs of the livestock unit, who went up and went up to the point, not to attack him during his transition?
  7. How is his body justified not to have been identified by hunters who went to the area in January 2025 as part of the hunting season for wild boars or dogs that helped them?
  8. How is his clothes justified to be intact after about 45 days of exposure to the weather, if the place of death really identified with the point of found?
  9. How is it justified by the body’s sepsis in external conditions (that is, not burial) not to have reached the next stage, as the viscera and organs of the body were in good condition, if a place of death and a place of founding were identified?
  10. How is it justified by the attitude at which he was found downhill, that is, with the lower body (legs) to the descent, the right hand extending upwards and the left hand extensive, as if someone had deposited his corpse there?
  11. How is it justified that the left sleeve completely covered the left palm, as if it had been held by a third party, given that there were no traces (holes, feet damage or teeth of predators)?
  12. How is it justified in the fact that the long jacket she was wearing was pulled to end over the abdomen, leaving an open part of it, if not because it moved there, without even traces of crash on the ground?
  13. How is it justified that the trouser trouser on the left foot is folded externally by about 30 cm in length, in a way to form a transport handle?
  14. How is it justified in breaking in the pants belt, which did not exist, if not because this one was a transport point?
  15. How is it justified that the shoes he was wearing were found to have no traces of the flora of the area, nor are they muddy, as it would be all about if he had arrived there by walking from the farms of the area, which were plunging from the rain?
  16. How is it justified that no money was found on him, despite the fact that he has been reported from the beginning that he had about 70 euros at his disposal?
  17. How is it justified that the fiber bone was found broken and worn out, without, of course, even if it was posthumous damage?
  18. How is it justified that the cadial fluids and the larvae found on the spot are not in line with stay at that point for more than 45 days?
  19. How is the limited sepsis justified given that humidity prevailed in the area and the average temperature in the area for the search period was more than 10 degrees Celsius, estimated at about 12 degrees Celsius, while there were days when the temperature was 18 degrees, especially during the Alkionids of January?
  20. How is it justified that Vasilis was completely empty in the stomach and the thin/large intestine. Is this finding compatible with the case of someone who stayed for days of unhappy and anhydrous days, as if he had been kept away from food and water and not someone who arrived on that day, especially after consuming food before his departure for his afternoon Valt?
  21. How is it justified by the fact that Basil was going regularly every afternoon on his own and suddenly disappeared at that time?
  22. Is the arrest incident described by the witness on 30-12-2024, with a specific description, actions and action of a group accompanying a person by removing it from the area where the last traces of Basil? The essential thing in this testimony is that this incident has taken place during the day, described in detail, and it does not matter if there is a difference in the time to describe in the order of 1 hour, as the incident actually took place. The time appreciation for someone who sat for coffee and then went to the shops could really be incorrect. How can this testimony be judged unconfirmed without being further tested?
  23. What was the route that Basil might be able to follow to move to that point? Is it in line with the situation in which his corpse was found?
  24. How is it justified by the appearance of two persons alleged by the thermal imprint of satellite to move, perpendicular to the rural road, to the point of the Basil’s corpse on 11-2-2025, and to return?

“Self -evident, the investigation and the final crisis belong exclusively to the bodies of justice,” the law firm said.

See in detail the questions that arise about the disappearance of Vassilis Kalogirou and the subsequent detection of his body here.