Eight months after the issuance of the first -instance judgment on the Eyethe prosecutor of the seat Stamatina waited He began to formulate her proposal to the Court of Appeal, before which the case of the national tragedy with the 104 dead is being tried.

The prosecutor has attempted to describe the complex legal framework, responsibilities and actions that are in many cases confused with each other, and tomorrow he will proceed to the facts and her view of whether or not the defendants are guilty.

“I haven’t slept and when I was sleeping I saw scenes from this tragedy. And when I woke up I saw all of you. The speech is a speech and I will submit the proposal in the coming days. This is a practice of recent years. I can’t write a sentence by Monday. Let me survive this trial, “the prosecutor said, responding to the claim for the accusation for a written deposit of her proposal.

“I will try to help your Court of Justice come to the ruling correctly, based on the laws we like or do not like. I would like to say with full awareness of what I will be expressing, the court by its ruling will not justify souls, the souls have been justified where they are. The court, what will justify is the confidence of the citizens in order to establish a sense of security if such a natural disaster is again. But also for the defendants they need to know that they will be tried by the laws in force. Justice must judge with its eyes open, as when it was first created, “the prosecutor said, who will exhaust her speech in the legal part of the case at today’s meeting.

“I consider it a moral debt to the people whose life was dissolved. All the people who have been forced to experience these moments, seeing relatives and relatives go out of life in this tragic way, while many of them lost property and in some cases their home has not been restored, “he said.

At the beginning of the substance of her speech, the prosecutor attempted to describe the state’s reaction mechanism to a disaster.

“One pillar is repression and the second pillar is civil protection. How are they structured? It made it difficult for me to understand that the first degree of self -government assists the Fire Brigade with whatever means it has. At the same time they have the obligation of energy for civil protection purposes. In short, civil protection is confused with repression and vice versa, but there are some limits that determine action. “

Applause

In the prosecutor’s report on organized removal, the audience broke out in applause. “Organized removal, when there is no security, it is not done. He tells you stay home when the fire is from the outside. But when the fire comes from 3.4.5 kilometers away, there must be a removal, “said Ms. waiting with the victims’ relatives to applaud, shouting” well he says “and the head of the headquarters asking to be quiet.

“What was said that” we didn’t catch up, they didn’t tell us. ” This is not the case as theoretical conception. When you have a disaster that has begun to evolve, you have to predict and act in time. Either prevent or limit the consequences. This as an independent obligation raises an issue. The one has no obligation to wait for someone else. The legislator kept in mind that a man who has a fire manages a fire cannot do it all, “the prosecutor said.

As he pointed out, removal is a precautionary measure, explaining that “existing means can be used and there are cases where local factors will be assisted. So this piece must evolve. It is not “to burn you John, to sprinkle with oil. Let you burn and then pay you the damage. What damage to pay? “

In many places in her speech, the prosecutor referred to the precautionary removal, noting that there is a view to the case -law that no suggestion is needed for the precautionary removal.

“I do not embrace it, because it must have a picture of the situation and cannot act without a plan,” he said, adding that “of course before we reach the rescue we should have exhausted the precautionary discharge. One could tell the residents at 6pm to leave Rafina. Then it would be up to everyone if he wants to do it, but he couldn’t say that they didn’t alert me. “

“The country has suffered from people’s courts”

At the point of the prosecutor’s speech, when a relative victim in Eye intervened commenting on a phrase, there was tension in the room with the president asking the relative to leave the room to calm down. The reason was again received by the prosecutor, who addressed the relatives, said:

“Even if by closing our eyes we imagine what you have experienced, it is a foreign pain. It is compassion in each other’s pain. I see people who, while experiencing this pain, experience it with dignity. I am sure that no one wants to be convicted that is not to blame. Justice must apply the law, the bad law that may exist. If we want to have democracy, because if we do not apply the law, we all know very well what will happen. I respect the pain but we cannot pass it on to the one who is not responsible. This country has suffered from People’s Courts and the old ones may remember. “

Subsequently, referring to the Fire Brigade, he noted that when the issue is the protection of the population de facto, intervention should be performed everywhere. “There are no first and second -class citizens. Hierarchy by law puts the number one protection of human life. The first reason is the ground coordinator. He must have the complete picture of the situation, mark the coordinating instruments, give as fully as possible what is at stake. The earthly leader is the one who arrives at the fire. But come on, the fire is not sitting on one side and other officers enter. If there is a senior hierarchically among them, he is considered a leader. He can seek strengthening forces through the ESCE (a single coordinating center of business).

The public prosecutor described the obligations of the earthly chief, who must act “with prudence and prudence”. “The capabilities of the system are finite and will always be finite. As the enemy of good is the best. In any disaster it is not only what medium is available, but also whether the treatment medium can be used, as the weather is often a deterrent to the response time and the use of the medium, ”he explained.

During her speech she referred to both the obligations of the citizens and the responses of the municipalities to plots that were gross and could not intervene. “The sinner first I put the stone! We know that if the municipality enters the plot to clean, there is a chance that someone will go to the municipality to say “why did you come in?” And these are usually the case with those who do not comply with their obligations, “he said, explaining that the Municipality cannot be implemented by law on a case -by -case basis because this will bring it but problems.

Intensity

Reaching the question of the characterization of the acts, which in this case are misdemeanors, the prosecutor referred to the law and the conditions required for negligence. “The possible deceit means that I accept the result. On the other hand, in negligence, the fact that I foresee it but I do not believe it will happen has another basis, overestimating my strengths, but I do not want it. If justice finds gross negligence, it can apply similar penalties, which do not make much difference from the others. “

Prosecutor: Do you think these people knew that this panic would become and accepted it?

Large: Yes! Yes! There is everything in the case file! The interrogator was saying! Why don’t you see them!

There was a disruption in the courtroom with the headquarters interrupting and leaving until the tones were dropped.