Free on restrictive terms were left recently, after their apologies, the seven arrested for the corruption case at the Rhodes Town Planning.

According to ERT, with unanimous decisions of investigator and prosecutor, they were left:

Free on the condition of his appearance once a month at the Police Department of his place of residence, the ban on leaving the country and the payment of a € 30,000 bail of 30,000 euros.

Free on restrictive terms of the appearance once a month at the Police Department, the ban on leaving the country and the payment of 100,000 euros, the 48 -year -old head of building permits.

Free on the restrictive terms of his appearance once a month at the Police Department, the ban on leaving the country and the payment of a € 50,000 cash guarantee, the 55 -year -old head of the construction control department.

Free on the restrictive terms of the appearance once a month at the Police Department, the ban on leaving the country and the payment of a financial guarantee of 70,000 euros, the 68 -year -old private architect engineer, who is regarded as the “brain” of the circuit.

Free on the restrictive terms of his appearance once a month at the Police Department, the ban on leaving the country and the payment of 40,000 euros, the 65 -year -old file responsible.

Free on the restrictive terms of his appearance once a month at the Police Department, the ban on leaving the country and the payment of a financial guarantee of EUR 20,000, the 54 -year -old employee of the service.

Free on the restrictive terms of the appearance once a month at the Police Department, the ban on leaving the country and the payment of 60,000 euros, the 48 -year -old private civil engineer.

It is noteworthy that the relatives of the defendants in the courthouse throughout their apology broke out on crying on the hearing of the prosecutor and investigator.

The seven stakeholders were consecrated on Monday morning and apologized for a total of 13 criminal offenses. Among them are accused of joining a criminal organization, ongoing forgery, submission of documents by a subsequent employee, a professional official, etc., all denied the charges attributed to them.