His previous opinion on the ephemeral construction in front of Kallimarmaro, he recalled the Central Council of Modern Monuments (KSNM) yesterday, which was convened yesterday, as requested by the Minister of Culture Lina Mendoni, in order to re -examine the issue of the issue. 4858/2021 “On the Protection of Antiquities and in general of the cultural heritage”.

According to a statement from the Ministry of Culture, after examining all the data, the CSNM opted for the revocation of his previous opinion on the subject “Approval of the request of the TEMPO body G. Argyropoulos EU, to grant the provisional concession permit”, because – after the authorities. 2, 3, 4, 6.7, 10 and 12 of the approval decision.

Specifically:

  • The competent Regional Service of Modern Monuments and Technical Works of Attica was never informed by the organizers for the commencement of work, nor on their course (terms 2,4,7,10,12).
  • In the photorealistic designs of lighting, which have been submitted to the Directorate for the Protection and Restoration of Modern Monuments, and were presented during the examination of the subject by the CSNM at session 10/13-3-2025, it appears that the construction is at the distance of the facade of the stadium and the facade tissues. On the contrary, it was found that the facade of the stadium was almost completely closed from construction and the tissues have been locked (terms 3,4,6,12).
  • In addition to the above, the final form of the construction did not correspond to the form of the request, which was examined by the CSNM on 13-3-2025, and in particular:

– It is nowhere to be seen from nowhere – I should – dimension the final comprehensive construction in architecture and static study (terms 2, 4,7,12).

– The dimensions of the implemented platform do not agree with the specifications submitted to the German language, nor the dimensions referred to in the application (terms 2,4,7,12).

– The metal frames placed on an elevated platform had not been mentioned and described either in the request or the architecture or static study (terms 2,4,7,12).

– It is not mentioned, nowhere in the application, that the height of the main construction differs from the height of three meters, which was the only height referred to in it (terms 2,4,7,12).

– Final model or photorealistic of the total structures to illustrate all constructions have never been given the services of the Ministry of Culture and the Council (Terms 2,4,7,12).

– Very heavy vehicles have entered the area for the transport of equipment and materials, causing damage to the surrounding area (terms 6.10).

– The approval decision concerned only a lightweight construction and not to the heavy construction implemented, which in any case is not described in the request (term 4).

– No study was submitted on the placement of air conditioners around the construction (term 7). “