The exhibition of the University of Ghent as executed on behalf of EPANAAM on the simulations of fireplace that had been made by experts by Dr. Maragkos of the University of Tempes in Greek Hoaxes.

Specifically, as noted in a letter signed by Dr. George Maragkos and Professor Bart Mercy, “the University of Ghent’s research team received the approval of EPANAAM to publicize its reports for full transparency. The research team at the University of Ghent did not participate in the analysis of the accident itselfNot even in writing the finding issued by EPASAM, and will avoid commenting on its content and conclusions. “

In its conclusions, the report emphasizes that “there are several important uncertainties”, including the position, size, type and method of infusion of the material that caused the fire.

To determine the amount of fuel that led to the fireplace (from CFD simulations) “requires a more comprehensive study than that provided in the group for examination.”

The team also states that further investigation is required and stresses that “given total uncertainties, it is not possible to determine the type of gas fuel that led to fireplace, with a reasonable degree of credibility from CFD simulations”.

“A more comprehensive sensitivity study is needed by incorporating the right thermophysical properties of fuel by examining, inter alia, the effect of heat source,” the researchers said.

Especially for the scenario that includes Tnot liberation of liquid fuel From two sources of fire and the formation of fireplace, “from the video material and other information about the Tempe accident, as made available to the group, it cannot be ascertained if the chosen geometry seems, a reasonable degree of accuracy, what happened in fact.”

Mr Maragkos, a material responsible researcher in the Tempe case he worked with with EPASAM, together with Professor Bart Mercy, had told Ellinika Hoaxes that the claims of some publications were “extremely misleading and unfounded”. As the Greek Hoaxes had written, the two researchers at the University of Ghent were never invited to investigate the accident and have never performed any simulation on behalf of EPANAAM.

“Their only task was limited to offering their scientific view on three preliminary simulations, sent by Mr Lakafosis, for which they provided comments to ENDAAAM, however, stating that they do not approve and disagree with the findings of the CFDs as CFDs as CFDs. That report, “Mr Maragkos told Hoaxes on April 6th.

In a letter to the head of the Investigation Committee, Bart Akkou, who are released by Hoaxes, it is reported that the Upid team, namely Dr. George Maragkos and Professor Bart Mercy, examined the available information, as provided by Kostas Lakafos, Costas Lakafos.

The findings note that there is a “opening” event, which precedes the creation of the fireplace, which is visible as a glow in the video. “This starting event has not been understood in sufficient details so that the UGent team is able to confirm that the use of the FDS is suitable for its modeling,” notes.