In a new post, Maria Karystianou commented on the lawsuit she filed against 14 New Democracy MPs, accusing them of “They were deceived to exercise duties as prosecutors (and not as Members) and to conduct a pre -trial examination for H. Triantopoulos for criminal jokes“

Maria Karystianou argues that their behavior is’Events betrayal because they framed article 86 of the Constitution and Law 3126/2003 on the responsibility of ministers (Article 5), betraying the confidence of the people and collaborating with the main perpetrators, with the aim of making their care and burning truth.“

The request for the lifting of the immunity of the 14 MPs – including Panagis Kappatos, Konstantina Karampatsolis, Maria Antoniou, George Brettakos and others – was forwarded to Parliament by the Supreme Court Public Prosecutor’s Office on Thursday, June 19th. The case is now expected to be examined by the Committee on Parliamentary Ethics, which will meet in the coming days.

In detail the post by Maria Karystianou:

“The lawsuit against the 14 MPs of the New Democracy who failed to deceive their duties as prosecutors (and not as Members) and to conduct a pre -trial examination for H. Triantopoulos for the criminal baza the confidence of the people and collaborating with the main perpetrators, with the aim of making their care and burning truth.
Because the refusal of their prosecution duties has resulted in no investigation, not being called witnesses, not requesting documents, not finding out who and amounts involved in the illegal act of the bazaoma, and of course not knowing what exactly did the time and the time they were raised, their compact and guilty rubbish.
The pre -trial Triantopoulos was still a government washing machine just so that they would not get out of time.
Therefore, what has begun feverishly to make your parrots to say that by Article 61 S in which the MP is not prosecuted for an opinion or vote he has given in the exercise of parliamentary duties, he does not apply and will not flush you!
Because these days you operated as prosecutors you failed to do for a preliminary exam for the emergence of truth, even though you explicitly due! With only a goal to disrupt the truth !!
The breach of Article 86S is not considered an opinion or a vote !!
For this burning issue, all the constitutionalists in the country, as well as the Association of Judges and Prosecutors and Bar Associations, are called upon to take a responsible position against the institutions that are being trampled on and the deceased citizens!
To answer whether the members of the pre -trial, quasi -prosecutors, are or are not criminal, that they have deliberately failed to conduct a preliminary examination, despite the opposite checks of Article 86 S and Article 5 §§ 4, 5 & 6 of Law 3126/2003 on the responsibility of ministers.
Understand it.
We woke up !!
The more you are illegitimate, the more you will find us in front of you!
To the end! “