By Helena Galaris

Her guilt Maria Marangeli With the code name “Catherine Keles” for false deposition at the expense of eight politicians in her case Novartisas well as the guilt of Filistor Desesbasidis The prosecutor of the Athens One -Member Criminal Court of Athens called for his deposits against four politicians.

On the contrary, the prosecutor asked both to get rid of the crime of false misrepresentation.

“The only straight line that exists is by Mr. Sarakis in America by his clients. There is no other default, of any form. Neither a lawsuit, no deposit, nor anything that shows an intention of misrepresentation. The defendants were invited to testify in the context of an investigation following a complaint that had already been made. The false misrepresentation was added by the prosecutor’s Office. They should be declared innocent of false misrepresentation, “the prosecutor of the headquarters told her speech.

The prosecutor asked Maria Marangeli’s guilt for what she has said at the expense of her Antonis Samaras, Andrea Loverdou, Mari Salma, Adoni Georgiadis, Yiannis Stournara, Lina Nikolopoulou, Dimitris Avramopoulos and Nikos Maniadakiswhile for Filistor Desesbasidis he asked to be convicted of his depositions at the expense of Adoni Georgiadis, Yiannis Stournara, Lina Nikolopoulou and Dimitris Avramopoulos.

“The defendants believed that they could say whatever they wanted, because they were under witness protection and no one could touch them. However, they have chosen from the beginning to say that they convey what they know from Frouzis. Of course adding their own crowns. But Frouzis denies them, but he has not been subjected to them … Doesn’t he really want judicial struggles as he said? Or is it afraid that a preliminary examination will dig above? This court does not judge corruption crimes, it is a simple one -member. The issue is not the defamation of the persons, but the right of justice was at stake, “the prosecutor said.

Referring to Mrs Marangelis’ deposition for the former prime minister Antonis Samarasthe prosecutor said: “Marangelis says that Novartis won the favor of Samaras. There is no parking in the Maximos Palace. Non -existent parking and only the heads of state come in. On 28/1/2018 he states that he met the poor and then closed the appointment. She left for Maximus, I say this, she didn’t say it. From her testimonies I see that Frouzis had the treatment that anyone who would visit him should have. The suitcase, colorful banknotes, parking phone call play a role. Mrs Marangelis yesterday gave another dimension. A bank investigation was done and it has been revealed that it was in no way involved in an illegal act. Mrs Marangelis was declared guilty of her deposition against Mr Samaras. ”

For the complaints of the accused at the expense of Andrea Loverdouthe prosecutor said:

“Mrs Marangelis presents the fact that the Loverdos bribery is certain and does not attribute it to Mr Frouzis, such as Mr Destbasidis. He presents what he says as facts and not as information. In her second testimony, she exemplifies all the incidents that led her to the conclusion.
Mr Loverdos was checked and nothing was found. To be declared guilty of complaints against Mr Loverdos, “the prosecutor said, while the defendant’s complaints against Mr Georgiadis said: the prosecutor said:

“He said in return for 2m euros which he got in a suitcase. He said he knew it from Frouzis. He reported a meeting of Frouzi and Georgiadis, a fact that both men acknowledged in the context of their responsibilities. Marangelis says that three receipts were made in front of her. For Georgiadis there were some unclear deposits of amounts but were not further investigated since nothing was found. “

Marangeli for Stournara and Nikolopoulou: “He confidently testified that Stournaras was paid and the money washed out through his wife’s company. She did not say that she was transferred from another, but she knows why she was involved in the event. The Stournara family accounts have been checked 11 times and nothing has been found. “

Marangeli for Avramopoulos: “Her claims are not confirmed. It leaves no room for misunderstanding. It transfers the payment of 200,000 euros as facts. The accounts were investigated but no money was found from Novartis. “

Desesbasidis for Georgiadis: “He overcame the red lines this time. He concluded and spoke of money laundering. He says he knew Georgiadis’ revenue and his moves could not be supported and concluded that he was rinsing money. He presented as a given that the revenue of the teles are virtual and comes from rinsing. “

Destbasidis for Avramopoulos: “The responsibility to decide on the pandemic has no Minister. Under no circumstances shall the responsibilities are concentrated in the face of the Minister of Health. Any statement of revocation to the audience is treated by me with disbelief. It is able to know the inaccuracy of his words. Did the offense, the objective and subjective substance is documented »

Destbasidis for Stournara and Nikolopoulou: “Although his claims are attributed to Frouzi, there is a difference. The issues of the organization of conferences are in his professional field, so whatever Frouzis said, Desesbasidis had to know how the conferences were being organized. It could not be misled. “

The trial will continue in the coming days with lawyers.