The thriller of Finikounda continues with each other as the two allegedly involved, give different versions of what happened on the campsite on Sunday, October 5th and the murders of the 68 -year -old owner and the 61 -year -old caretaker.

Both the accomplice and the 22 -year -old alleged perpetrator of the brutal crime blame each other.

The case file has reached the prosecutor’s office in Kalamata and the two 22 -year -old arrested are expected to arrive there at noon. It is recalled that one appeared voluntarily yesterday at noon at the Attica Police Department with his lawyer, displaying himself as a collaborator and showing as a guilty of his peer, who was arrested shortly afterwards in Kallithea. Achilles’ heel stood by a photo showing two people boarding a motorcycle and approaching Finoni from Methoni.

In the presence of their lawyers, the alleged executioner claimed that he had nothing to do with the double murder, while the accomplice had already described in every detail what had happened.

At the same time, the 22 -year -old alleged accomplice said to the authorities that he had personal differences with the victim, and explained that the goal was not to kill him but to earn money.

What the 22 -year -old accomplice for the murder scene claimed

“The night when the murder took place we started together for Finikounda. We stayed in a hotel. My friend entered the campsite wearing a blond wig to ask for money. I wasn’t in the room when the evil happened. When my friend returned running on the motorbike he told me, there was a stupid. I was not alone, they were with others, they moved against me and started shooting »

Yesterday, the nephew of the 68 -year -old campsite owner was transferred to Athens, who recognized the killer of the two men.

He allegedly recognized the 22 -year -old arrested in Kallithea, while claiming that he did not see the second person.

Involvement of another person? The phone call through the campsite

Officers from the Department of Homicide are now investigating the possibility of more involved. The microscope has been put in place a third person who had a telephone conversation with one of the two 22 -year -olds a few minutes before the crime and then with a cellphone inside the campsite.

But is there a moral perpetrator or does the case describe the 22 -year -old accomplice? Is the motivation for the extortion or a third person “put” his hand in order for the 68 -year -old camping owner to be murdered?

One point examined by ELAS researchers is whether there was a telephone communication of the perpetrators with a person from the narrow environment of the victim some hours before the murder and whether the moment the executioner came in with his two victims was accidental or someone had informed him that the owner was in the front.

These are some of the unanswered questions that security men are answering to answer the case, and if the double murder behind blackmail and personal disputes lies the huge property of the 68 -year -old.

According to police sources at skai.gr, the removal of telephone privacy will answer whether it is a death contract.

At the same time, it is not excluded that a representation of the double murder is to be requested in order to clarify everything.