George Papandreou launched a full-frontal attack on Nikos Androulakis, three days before the second round of the internal elections in the Movement for Change, calling on him to answer four questions.
In an informative note, the side of the former prime minister, on the occasion of what Nikos Androulakis told Mega about the autonomous course of the Movement for Change, states that Nikos Androulakis “revealed that he wants to see what percentage the Movement for Change will get in the elections, for to see who to work with. In fact, he noted, he can not ignore the will of the people. Which autonomous course, then? And how will the faction be strengthened and grow, when its course will depend on third factors, but not on our own priorities and our own progressive ideological and political proposals?
G. Papandreou also criticizes Mr. Androulakis, saying that he avoids talking about the need to defend the autonomy of the party’s politics “against interests, established, but also any other form of extra-institutional centers and factors”.
The second issue for which the side of George Papandreou accuses Nikos Androulakis, is that he misinforms when he refers to P. Sanchez and A. Costa stating that he will remain an MEP if elected. “It’s nothing to do with the truth. “The first was a member of parliament and the second, the mayor of Lisbon, who was nominated by the Portuguese Socialist Party as prime minister.”
With the claim that the leadership gap in the Parliament until the next elections is a critical factor and anything but positive for the strengthening of the Movement for Change and the faction, as stated in the informal information note of G. Papandreou, they address Mr. Androulakis questions: “Who will stand against Mitsotakis and Tsipras? Who will give battle to the leading institution of the Republic? Who will shape with his total presence and action the position of our party, with which we will ask the Greek people to vote, if not its president? Mr. Mitsotakis and Mr. Tsipras, will be able to impose undisturbed the riveting conservative bipolarity, which suits the few and the rich, but makes the lives of the many lifeless “.
The third issue concerns the renewal for which, it is noted that “it has not answered yet, because it characterizes the renewal of the oldest party and client practices that followed in 2013, as evidenced by the publications of the time, holding a leading party position.”
The fourth issue is about the debate where Nikos Androulakis is accused of hiding and is called to answer “why does he not accept the proposal for a public debate that will allow for full and substantial positions? What’s the difference; That it needs content and specific suggestions?
Follow Skai.gr on Google News
and be the first to know all the news
.
