Is it a front for fascism to adopt the arguments of fascists, asked the SYRIZA wing the Minister of the Interior Makis Voridisresponding to the official opposition leader Alexis Tsipras. “To shake off the burden of this marriage [..] you have but one way: to join us in the strategic aim, and to vote in favor of the provision, otherwise you remain heavily exposed” said Mr. Voridis.

After emphasizing that the meeting of Mr. Gerapetritis with the judge of the AP, “in order to discuss organizational and procedural issues related to the specific case and the implementation of the specific provision, it is absolutely legitimate, normal, and mandatory”, said that Mr. Tsipras developed the argument of defending those who are affected. He even underlined that Mr. Tsipras today mentioned for the first time the claim that the existing provision violates the Constitution, and that the provision comes after the meeting because the unconstitutionality is established. He also said that Mr. Tsipras went further, that here we may have a violation of human rights and the country will be exposed.

“They haven’t taken it that far either.” Why do you come and adopt this venal argument at such a critical time? To justify not voting for the provision? asked the Home Secretary, and continued: Do you take that view? In this way do you agree with the view that this legal paradox should be blocked, not to say unacceptable, so that criminals appear as leaders of political parties?

Are you helping in this way, since we share a common strategic goal, or are you blinded by campaign targeting or targeting a specific audience? In the antisystem, in the blur, in the rage, the enraged, the indignant?

The dilemma is clear and Mr. Tsipras’s appointment makes SYRIZA’s position difficult: “After this argument, to shake off the weight of this argument and argument you have only one way: join us in the strategic objective and vote in favor of the provision or you remain heavily exposed” concluded Mr. Voridis.