A fierce attack on “87” was launched by a post on social media Stefanos Kasselakisonce again accusing them of “replacement discounting.”

“They invented that “Kasselakis himself asked for the censure”. That is, I went to the Central Committee and censured myself! Or I begged them to censure me when they didn’t want to!” says Mr. Kasselakis, adding that “I made the decision not to facilitate them, to reveal their intentions. If they wanted a fall, they would have to bear the responsibility of censure. And that happened. Their choices revealed them to the whole society

“The bitter glasses of their choices will drink them to the end and these choices will accompany them throughout the rest of their political journey”, he then underlines, to conclude:

“On the weekend, we take the place of the mechanisms with our vote. On the weekend we all vote for congressmen. It’s a matter of democracy.”

See the entire post by Stefanos Kasselakis:

They go to OM meetings and can’t stand.
So what did they invent?
That “Kasselakis himself asked for the censure”.
That is, I went to the Central Committee and censured myself! Or I begged to be censured when they didn’t want to!

They forget that while I was in the fires in Attica and the dead fish in Thessaly, they were meeting from their vacations on zoom about how they will method my downfall by blackmailing the censure but without charging it themselves.

I made the decision not to make it easy for them, to reveal their intentions. If they wanted a fall, they would have to bear the responsibility of censure. And that happened.
Their choices exposed them to the whole society.

Criticism is their choice.
The replacement discount is their choice.
It is their decision to (allegedly) block me.

The bitter glasses of their choices will drink them to the end and these choices will accompany them throughout the rest of their political journey.

On the weekend, we take the place of the mechanisms with our vote.
At the weekend we all vote for delegates.
It is a matter of democracy.