The Tempe case, the exploitation of the issue by the opposition according to the government’s approach, as well as the statement by the opposition leader on justice during the interview of the Minister of State, Maki Voridisin “90.1 fm”.

Starting with the Tempe railway tragedy, “Normally this case should unite us all. The request to be given justice is common, to punish the culprits, to reveal the truth. Those who are involved and are responsible for causing this tragedy to lead to justice and judge them, as they should. “it was his introductory comment.

But this, and another that “this thing has ended up being tool and start systematic, selective interventions on the part of the opposition,” said the Minister of State, who admitted, as he said, that the opposition brought the government “in a difficult position ” In the sense, he clarified, that “Here’s something completely unacceptable. On the one hand, selective evidence of the case file are selected, which is secret and neither the subject of public dialogue is allowed nor the politicians to take a stand. And on the other hand, the government may not be able to open its mouth, because if you do it, they tell you that you are interfering with the questioning. “. But, continued, and “If he does not speak, he is exposed to vulgarity, the muddy we have heard all the past.”

Subsequently, regarding the “theory of concealment”, the Minister of State wondered whether it was given that there was an illegal burden. “No, it is the object of the interrogation. Now there are some videos that there is no load. Tomorrow may come out something else, I don’t take a seat on it »explained and added that according to opposition claims, “The unknown loader has an unknown relationship with the government, which leads her to take up science, this is what we have been facing for two years now.”

While giving an extension to the subject, saying that it is “Situations we had lived with ‘Little Maria in Evros, with Novartis’s plot. All this collapsed then. ” In conclusion, “It is miserable and vulgar, without the slightest element, to launch this heavy category in the government of concealment.”

Called to comment on the statement by PASOK President Nikos Androulakis, according to which his confidence in justice has been shaken, the Minister of State described it (the statement) “unacceptable”. And this is because, as he argued, he talks about “shocking trust in the institution”. Indeed, M. Voridis argued that they were cannibalize justice before even making any decision. He wondered whether Mr Androulakis, from the position of the opposition leader, says that his confidence in justice, government, parliament, political institutions, “How exactly will our society work to resolve the differences? “

The result will be “To enter the logic of judicial decisions that are convenient for the opposition”noted and continued: “When the Independent Authorities make decisions that serve Mr. Androulakis’ political plan, the Independent Authorities are very good. If they have a different approach and do not make the decision serving his political plan, they are manipulated by the government. “. Finally, if you accept the independence of the authorities and justice, “You can agree or disagree with a decision but you do not reach the institutional challenge.” The ending will be, he concluded, that there is no “common way to solve our issues and this is deeply undermining of the democratic function itself.”

For PASOK’s conflict with the newspaper “Parapolitika”, on the way the form performed the statements of Messrs. Geroulanou and Duke, Mr Voridis, after noting that he had read the texts of PASOK’s two top executives in the newspaper, testified that “they point out a different political approach to PASOK’s tactics. I also heard the statements of Mr. Nikitiadis et al. On the issue of justice, it is clear that they are taking a distance. ” He also made PASOK’s “serious internal question”.

With the phrase, “we understand what we read”, he argued that “neither the journalists are to blame nor Nikos Romanos”, who intervened on the issue. “They cannot pass on their inner question either on the side of the ND or on the side of journalists.”it was his final comment.