“Mr Triantopoulos’ decision – I think it is a brave act of himself and is a proposal that has no precedent,” government spokesman Pavlos Marinakis said during the information of government editors.

As the government spokesman pointed out ‘He asks to prosecuted against On the basis of a indictment, the content of which he refuses, that is to say, innocent, on the basis of a proposal which, as we have said, has no evidence of any evidence that burdens him. And while there is a clear and comfortable parliamentary majority by the ND government, Mr Triantopoulos is asking the pre -trial investigation and then to send him to send him to send him to send him. to his natural judge. ”

He explained that if we put this together with the Prime Minister’s announcement for the revision of Article 86 of the Constitution ‘These moves are significant steps to decrease the very large gap which exists with a great deal of society that will be justified in many ways I have an increased sense of mistrust of the political system and institutions. So here’s where we should showWe are seriousness as a whole. “

He then launched an attack on the oppositionsaying that “did not show the minimum seriousness And responsibility for listening to this brave proposal by Christos Triantopoulos. Of this unprecedented proposal of Chr. Triantopoulos. “

“Even we who have seen a series of PASOK attitudes and objections that many times the limits of populism go beyond and sterile confrontationwe waited for another reaction »he said about PASOK.

Reported Specifically in PASOK’s proposal For a pre -trial committee, pointing out that although it does not agree with its content, Mr Triantopoulos is coming and requesting to be accepted to prosecute.

He also read a statement of PASOK spokesman Costas Tsoukalas on March 5in which it is highlighted among other things: “Since no one wants to get in the way of justice why not have Mr Triantopoulos’s referral to the reasoning in the prosecution?” and refers to the referral to the natural judge in order to judge whether he is innocent or guilty.

“He has said so well that he could well make up for at least this particular wording. Great. Why is it so, ” He stressed, as he said, there is a disagreement with the content of the PASOK proposal.

He then said that he wants to dissolve 4 lies that have been heard these days and by other opposition parties.

  1. “Lie first: That this proposal is illegal. No one has been told by the opposition from the opposition from where the Constitution shows that this is illegal. Because it doesn’t come from anywhere.
  2. Second lie: He wants to avoid the suffering of pre -criticism because there will be investigative acts there, A, B, Oh … And this is scared by Triantopoulos, the government, Mitsotakis … “. He stressed that the Judicial Council consisting of five senior judges consists of three Areopagites and two members of the CoE who are drawn to people who are at the highest grade of the respective courts and can do all the investigative acts that the pre -trial committee could do. The question is who does anyone prefer to do judicial acts? Supreme judges or parties?
  3. “Lies: Yes but so the indictment will not be expanded. ” Lies. If the preliminary investigation wants to investigate another offense, another person must send a proposal to the plenary of the House with 30 signatures as was initially done by PASOK. The Judicial Council can do the same. No right is lost and none of what the opposition says is true.
  4. “Lies fourththe common lie of PASOK and Greek solution as I said in my post today with a video “The Green Solution”: Yes, but Mitsotakis said the opposite in ’18 and denounced the then government for the closure of pre -trial. “

Also said that he considers this the most vulgar lie and indeed it is bastard of PASOK that is trying to Rinse the novartis sail.

He went on to say that ‘In 2018 the then government tried to sends to justice Initially through the Pre -trial their politicians her opponent. When the government then realized that the goals and poverty of what the hoodlums were saying were being revealed, then demanded that the pre -trial investigation would be closed without a criminal prosecution. Today, Triantopoulos calls for criminal prosecution, to vote for the majority of the minority proposal and to go to his natural judge. Should PASOK say the same as the Greek solution? “

In closing his answer, he stressed that we have a Triantopoulos proposal two very important news: One is the decision itself. It is a brave decision, a decision that in combination with the forthcoming revision of Art. 86 changes what we had as an impression on the immunity of ministers and deputy ministers. “News second (for us are not news but I think it’s clear anymore), the opposition has lost every last trace of credibility.”she said and accused the opposition of wanting to play her own communication game.

Tsoukalas: Mr. Marinakis is the boss and his client digital

Immediate was the reaction of PASOK spokesman Costas Tsoukalas, who launched an attack on the government spokesman.

“Mr. Marinakis did not find the courage and arguments to answer my questions. Like every time he can’t say anything convincing, he recruits the “propaganda“fed to the Maximus Palace by taxpayers’ money to tosses mud To the political opponents of the government.

Now confirmed in a clear manner that it is the boss and his client digital. Mr Marinakis, do you not know that the process of referring to the natural judge provided for by our Constitution is made through the plenary of the House after a finding of the pre -trial committee? Let the pre -trial committee perform the role that the Constitution reserves. Don’t continue this downhill anymore. Democratic institutions are not an accordion. Democracy is a very serious matter to play with it, “Mr Tsoukalas said.

Romanos answer to Tsoukalas: Mr. Tsoukalas, Mr. Androulakis and PASOK are deeply exposed

Subsequently, the ND spokesman, Nikos Romanosreplied to Mr. Tsoukala’s post, stating:

“On March 5th, PASOK spokesman Mr Tsoukalas said in response to a question by Mrs Tremis at Newsbomb.gr, where we found ourselves:” We have a prime minister who comes out and says that there will be no obstacle to justice and not going to light. Triantopoulos with the rationale in the prosecution, since it concerns the four officials who, together with Mr. Triantopoulos, co -opted for the blindfold, the alteration – he says he will be restored to his interviews – and to go to the natural judge, and he will not be judged. The role of the judge will do it by natural justice. “

While trying to reinforce his argument against the regular conduct of his pre -trial work, he added: “So, if the government says that I am already negatively predisposed to referring him – and I have already decided – and I have the majority, that I will not.

Now, you asked me about the issue of the indictment upgrading. We have said that we have one beginning: where there is a prosecutor’s report, not a mere case file, because if we go to the logic of a simple case file, anyone who suits Mr Romanos tomorrow for example for something, without considering it we should refer him.

We have said: where There is a prosecuting finding thorough You have to go to the natural judge”

To conclude: ‘If tomorrow arise other offenses For the same person or other offenses for other persons, this procedure may be repeated. So nothing is hidden, we are just respected every time exactly the conclusions that justice has already drawn through work. “

The PASOK spokesman said so correctly that we don’t need to add anything. It is now obvious that Mr. TsoukalasMr. Androulakis and PASOK are deeply exposed And the least they owe is a public apology. And it is equally obvious that they are not interested in the truth at all, but only the vulgar political tooling of a national tragedy. “