A question to the relevant ministers about real estate purchases from Turkish funds in border areas of our country were submitted on Thursday 11 MPs of the New Democracy.

In the question “Evaluation of aggressive real estate and business markets in the remote areas of Turkish funds that appear in the form of Greek or European businesses” it is emphasized that “over time the law in force on real estate transactions in the border regions was aimed at the registration of other national security and other national security and other national security. Rights. “

The relevant ministers are asked, among other things, what measures the government intends to take to deal with the possibility of aggressive and directed real estate or businesses from foreign funds in sensitive national areas, such as Thrace and the islands.

The question of the 11 MPs of ND in detail

Athens, 27-3-2025

To ministers

Governance
National Economy and Finance
Growth
Justice
Rural Development and Food
Internal
Shipping and Island Policy
Citizen Protection

SUBJECT: “Elimination of aggressive real estate and business markets in the remote areas of Turkish funds that appear in the form of Greek or European businesses”

According to Article 24 of Law 1892/1990 “… the border areas are the prefectures of the Dodecanese, Evros, Thesprotia, Kastoria, Kilkis, Lesvos, Xanthi, Preveza, Rodopi, Samos, Florina and Chios, the Islands and the Islands, the Islands and the Islands, Konitsa of the former Prefecture of Ioannina, Almopia and Edessa of the former Prefecture of Pellis and Sintiki of the former Prefecture of Serres as well as the former communities of Otton, Mathraki and Ereikousis … “.

The above areas in the Ionian, Epirus, Macedonia, Thrace and the islands of the Eastern Aegean were described as “border” and are treated as “defensive” areas with a presidential decree issued in accordance with the same article “on the proposal of the Ministers of Foreign Affairs, Economics, Economics, Economics, Economics,

Over time, the law in force on real estate transactions in the border areas aimed to secure the country’s national security and territorial integrity of the country that outweigh other public interests or individual rights eg AK 281, commercial or professional leases.

Laws that enforced the relevant restrictions in the past were Legislative Decree 22/24.6.1927 and later. 1366/1938.

Following the conviction of Greece by the Dec, which by the decision of 305/87 of 30.5.1989 ruled that the provisions of AN. 1366/1938 contradicted Articles 48, 52 and 59 of the EEC Treaty on the free movement of workers, freedom of establishment and freedom of service, was passed by Law 1892/1990 which abolished the previous 1366/1938. The new law redefined the border areas and forbidden transactions, maintaining the restrictions for both domestic and foreigners, but faced nationals, European citizens and expatriates, but maintaining the nationals. 22/24.6.1927, that is, the restrictions could only be lifted by the granting of a relative leave.

Articles 24 to 32 of Law 1892/1990 were unfortunately replaced in 2011 by a rough and scribbled legislation under Article 114 of Law 3978/2011 and later by Article 43 of Law 4278/2014 which was improved by Article third of Law 4126/2013 and other provisions.

The current institutional framework restricts the bans of living transactions in real estate of border areas only to third -country nationals outside the EU and the EU and prefers the theory of the headquarters to the theory of control over nationality or more right to nationality. This development allows and facilitates natural persons who have European nationality at the same time, although they have a third country nationality, such as Turkish, Russian, Chinese, etc. or legal entities who have created a seat in Greece or the EU to be able to easily acquire real estate or corporate share and shareholders. Legislation, case -law and “theory of the legal person of the legal entity” that has been shaped in recent years, against “control theory” under which citizenship was examined to a natural person who controls the legal person in the past, becomes extremely dangerous to the security, defense and defense and defense and defense.

In recent years we have been denounced by notaries, lawyers, public officials and ordinary citizens, that real estate and business markets have multiplied remarkably in the areas of Eastern Macedonia and Thrace as well as in the islands of the Eastern Aegean, which are not just “border”.

The mayor of Alexandroupolis also made a public complaint on 27.2.2025 in the forum of East Macedonia and Thrace, speaking of aggressive Turkish and Bulgarian markets and “settlement of Evros by Muslims”. The issue was also mentioned by the newspaper TA NEA on March 22-23, 2025 entitled “Investigations on the Turkish Real Estate – The Secrets of Thrace. What is the EYP looking for in Thrace and in the islands of the Eastern Aegean … “.

Given the Turkish aggression, the Turkish leadership’s repetitive statements to revise the Lausanne Treaty and the neighboring effort of the neighbor to Turkishization and tooling the religious Muslim minority in Thrace

We apply to the responsible Minister the following records:

We ask that we are submitted by the tables, from the land registries, the National Land Registry or the local notaries, with all the deeds- transactions carried out by 2011 per county, by foreign or legal persons of European or third countries, in all prefectures.

Are the relevant ministers asking?

What measures does the government intend to take to deal with the possibility of aggressive and directed real estate or business markets from foreign funds in sensitive national areas, such as Thrace and the islands?

Who and how does it control the red loans-funds who are usually based abroad, to whom the auctioned real estate of the remote areas?

Does the competent ministry intend to restore the regime of controls to a natural person to the legal and defense areas, so that growth does not work at the expense of national security in the remote areas?

What policies do the government plan for the demographic shield of acrimonious Greece?

What has the government do to implement the finding of the House of Commons for Thrace? Why has not been designated a coordinator and monitoring committee to date, as requested by the inter -party, which would mobilize and coordinate the work of the relevant Ministries?

The MPs

EURIPIDIS ST. Stylianidis, MP Rodopi ND
THEODOROS KARAOGLOU, MP of Thessaloniki ND ND
MAXIMOS HARAKOPOULOS, MP of Larissa ND
IOANNIS PASCHALIDIS, MP Kavala ND
MILTIADIS CHRYSOMALIS, MP ND MPs
ANASTASIOS DIMOSHAKIS, MP Evros ND
MANOS N. KONSOLAS, MP of Dodecanese ND
GIORGOS VLACHOS, MP East Attica ND
GIORGOS KARASMANIS, MP Pella ND
THEOFILOS LEONTARIDIS, MP of Serres ND
CHARALABOS ATHANASIOU, MP of Lesvos ND