The removal of civil servants were mentioned, inter alia, by government spokesman Pavlos Marinakis saying that “we will enter a time when good ones will be rewarded and those who do not do their job will have sanctions.”

More specifically, Mr. Marinakis stressed to ERT that “When we are talking about evaluation of civil servants, we are not necessarily referring to redundancies or permanently removed but also rewarding consistently, while noting that a permanent employee loses his job only by doing a heavy disciplinary offense, which is associated with a criminal offense. their work or even if they are there they do not serve. We will enter a time when the good will be rewarded and those who do not do their job well will have sanctions. “

“We say that we put Article 103 of the Constitution to remove permanentness on the table with no exceptions. Not to return to the seasons of Klafthmonos Square. But when one, for example, is missing from his position, unjustifiably, repeatedly ignores those who come to serve them. It is, for example, in a service, there are various services, very sensitive social, very important, neuralgic eg. Those who give the drugs and while it should be five ahead are two or you go to serve you again and again and ignore you, ” noted.

At the same time, in the Triantopoulos case, Mr. Marinakis said that “It is wrong to refer to a minister as a result of party correlations »while stressing that a proposal for pre -trial pre -trial will be submitted by New Democracy next week.

In detail the interview of government spokesman Pavlos Marinakis:

For the evaluation

The constitutional review, due to the increased majority it presupposes to revise an article, is a prerequisite and is reasonable. The Constitution is above any other law, so to change an article of the Constitution. From what is being revised, after all, there must be increased majorities of 180 votes in one of the two compositions of the House. Whether it’s a great opportunity for our country, or it’s at least 10 lost years, depending on the attitude of the parties.

I remember when I was a student we had a great opportunity in 2006 to revise Article 16, to win many years, many students in the country, not to leave students abroad, and we managed to stay and Cuba for another 20 years.

So the Constitution, when it comes time to change, is a very serious affair. Perhaps the most serious political affair. What does the prime minister do? Asked in interviews after his meetings, he puts the agenda. So we have already put some articles in the discussion. Because it’s not something a government can do on its own. We do not have 180 seats and could not be done so important anyway. Article 16 I said, for non -state universities not only the branches, but to be established from the beginning non -state universities. Article 86, which we have already changed, that is, to have the same limitation on all, political and non -political, by abolishing the ambassador and now we want not to be the result of party correlations or referral of a minister or deputy minister.

One of the issues that have arisen from the tragic accident of the Tempi is the evaluation of civil servants. And when we talk about evaluation of civil servants, we are not necessarily referring to redundancies or permissions. We are also referring to a consistent reward. One of the many that emerged from Tempi was because this man was in this position, because he was missing the one who had to be in his place. These are why they express themselves in a very tragic way when our fellow human beings die, but also expressed in our daily lives. Now that we talk can a civil servant be fired? Can. When; It can be fired for a heavy disciplinary offense, which is linked to a criminal act, etc., is the only reason that this serious ratification should be for a civil servant. In our opinion no. We say it clearly. As in the private sector, our good performance leads to a reward, our poor performance in sanctions not necessarily to lose our job.

So what do we say? We say that we put Article 103 of the Constitution on the table for removing permanence without exceptions. Not to return to the seasons of Klafthmonos Square. But when one, for example, is missing from his position, unjustifiably, repeatedly ignores those who come to serve them. It is, for example, in a service, there are various services, very sensitive social, very important, neuralgic eg. Those who give the medicines and while it should be five ahead are two or you go to serve you again and again and ignores you.

For the referral of ministers – deputy ministers

Article 86, which we have already changed, that is, to have the same limitation of all, political and non -politicians, abolishing the ambassador and now we want not to be the result of party correlations or referral of a minister or deputy minister. All countries have a filter, but this filter is not the case. An example could be a body of judges, supreme judges, who receives a lawsuit against a minister or deputy minister and evaluate whether or not he should proceed with the Judicial Council. It is a mixed body that has other countries with a majority of judges rather than Members. What do I mean? Because I think it’s a very serious conversation that will culminate in the constitutional review. We also saw it in the case of Triantopoulos. We have seen it, we now see it in the case of parties’ proposals and our proposal is also coming. I think it is very wrong and creates a great uncertainty in the world. Second and third thoughts. Whether or not a minister – deputy minister will be referred, an end to all minister or deputy minister to be the result of party associations. That is, if you have 155 seats, if the other has 30 seats, 40 seats. So what we need to do is change the filter. In no country in Europe this is done directly. And why isn’t it direct? Because if ministers ran to courts that may be revengeful for any lawsuit, then they would not do another job. But on the other hand we cannot have two -speed citizens. One cannot because he is a minister to escape because his party has a majority in the House. That’s why we followed this street.

In the case of Karamanlis

All the procedures provided by the Constitution, that is, will be followed by the House, will be submitted first of all, as we as a parliamentary group, our parliamentary group its own proposal. These proposals will be discussed, the plenary decisions will be made and any proposal that goes to the pre -criticism will be followed by the press. But be careful, as we have said in Triantopoulos’ case and as the Constitution defines, it does not prohibit this as long as some formally follow. What do we want? We want who will decide which witnesses must be called upon to be called upon by the justice that has sent the case file, because there is already a material from justice, as in the case of Mr. Triantopoulos. Whether it will be alpha or beta offense, beyond those offered, whether the defendants will be one, two or three. The judges, the supreme judges and not the parties.

They say, for example, you do not want to become a pre -trial triadopoulos who did the procedure, as required by law, to go to the natural judge and not to come to the prime minister. If anyone wants anyone, the Judicial Council to testify as a witness, the prime minister is still compulsory, and if a proposal is made by a party to testify in the pre -trial, it is the result of a decision of the correlations. If the Judicial Council considers that the first crime is not enough and must be upgraded, then the House must respect it.

What do we say? We say that the Triantopoulos model is the outcome. The driver as to the ending. So what is the ending? Is politicians judged like citizens? Clean chats. There are no citizens of two categories. All the laws are provided by law, with complete respect for the proceedings and from now on by the majority and decisions, at the end of the day there will be a crisis by the Natural Judge, the Judicial Council, and if it says something else we are here to respect it.

ND’s proposal for pre -trial

In the next few days, the ND proposal for pre -trial will be submitted during the week to come.