“There was a scandal in OPEKEPE,” said the PASOK-Maching Press Spokesman for his television appearance on SKAI and the show “Good Morning”.

Kostas Tsoukalas also referred to the revealing dialogues of the case file between the New Democracy officials and party executives.

“There was a mechanism that informed some – who did not have the criteria – to falsely declare that they had land and to receive subsidies by dividing European resources at the expense of others. If the European Public Prosecutor’s Office did not exist – where the OPECEPE administration did not allow it to enter, unthinkable things – we would have not learned anything. We learned them because there was the European Public Prosecutor’s Office not because the government took some initiative. “

The press spokesman spoke of a picture of the government’s decline and stressed that “the only solution for the country to leave this picture of decline for which Kyriakos Mitsotakis is responsible for being an unreliable prime minister who declares either unable to control ministers and executives. But first, it should be ensured that all necessary steps are taken to make no limitation. Here, Mr. Karamanlis has not yet been referred. The pre -trial committee is ongoing. Also, as you know, political persons will be justified for ministerial acts that ended before 2023. “

And he emphasized: “Political change is made by elections, not by the summer palaces, but first there will be absolute assurance that no offenses are limited.”

Concerning PASOK’s forthcoming parliamentary initiatives, Mr Tsoukalas stressed that “we have found sufficient aggravating evidence to further check possible criminal liability. We will come with the most convenient tool for control, which our role requires. “

“Through the reading of the case file, there is a regime of favoritism created after the New Democracy was taken over by the New Democracy. Indeed, they began on SYRIZA but instead of healing them, the New Democracy raised them. In addition, it is denied the narrative that it would rule with competence and excellence. We see exactly the upside: rot, power arrogance and corruption.

There is an attempt to blur responsibilities. With the resignations of members of the government they are trying to create a “health zone” around the prime minister to protect him. The prime minister again “knew nothing” but appears with boldness as the politician who supposedly “solves” the Gordian bond. A prime minister who in a series of scandals never knows what his ministers and other government officials are doing is a good prime minister.

There is a political responsibility for the prime minister, and even on one more issue: It’s like we didn’t take any lesson after the financial crisis, because under the New Democracy, a regime of mismanagement was similar to that of the previous government on K. Karamanlis, who brought the country in 2009.