For his intervention Evangelos Venizelos to migratory and the constitutionality of new government interventionswhere he states, inter alia, that Article 15 ECHR is equivalent to a siege of siege, he replied. Paul Marinakis When informing political editors on Thursday afternoon (10/7).

“When a constitutionalist is placed, he is not based on whether he has been co -operated with a party or belonging to a particular political space, ” It was the comment of a government spokesman. “It is a scientific analysis and in the context of democratic functioning it is obvious that it is respected. From then on, we do not activate Article 15 of the ECHR. We simply rely on that there are conditions referring to this article, with a specific legal documentation and the utilization of a series of decisions, that is, case law that substantiates our particular position. “

“It is by analogy the same documentation and legal analysis followed in a corresponding immigration crisis 5 years ago, in March 2020. The treatment of this crisis then both legal and operational was absolutely successful. So we have every reason to believe that we will again have the corresponding result. It is a necessary and absolutely legal decision for the good of the country and citizens. Greece is a state – law. As can be seen from the lack of announcements of other parties, this was also evidenced by the EU stamp, which if he had said the opposite we would have seen announcements. “

“At the moment the country has to react to an extraordinary situation and a new crisis that it has not caused, but is obliged to deal with it. And we will do it with all our might under the applicable provisions. “