By Despina Vlepaki

In today’s duel in Parliament, Nikos Androulakis is expected to highlight the hypocrisy of the ND and to establish the reasons why the majority of the Inquiry Committee is a limitation period of the possible criminal responsibilities of Makis Voridis and Makis Voridis.

Will be detailed to the details of its case file that sent the European Public Prosecutor’s Office in Parliament and will remind you of the earlier statements of Kyriakos Mitsotakis and other government officials on the examination committees that do not produce results As they said in the past, in an attempt to illuminate the political mockery of the majority, as reported by Harilaou Trikoupi.

PASOK’s president will set emphatically the dilemma in Kyriakos Mitsotakis to voted in favor PASOK’s proposal and will emphasize that if the prime minister is committed, then PASOK will only support the proposal for an Inquiry Committee. His intention was revealed in an interview with Vasilis Chiotis.

“I sent a message to Mr. Mitsotakis and I will send it on Tuesday. So I am not afraid of anything, I say: Mr Mitsotakis, I have no problem voting for the exam, if you are publicly committed on Tuesday that the next day, Wednesday, the New Democracy will also vote for PASOK’s pre -trial. “Nikos Androulakis told SKAI 100.3.

However, the scenario for the ND to vote in favor of PASOK’s pre -trial proposal does not concentrate chancesand with this given PASOK MPs are expected to vote against the government’s proposal to set up an Inquiry Committee. Of course, as PASOK executives say, the PASOK will give this present to the examination of the exams if they all appear to be set up with the votes of the majority. In fact, the big battle will be given to call additional witnesses who will be a peak point for the opposition party.

At the same time, the government spokesman responding to opposition scenarios on ND’s possible withdrawal from voting On her proposals for pre -trial, she left all the possibilities open, causing new round of controversywith Kostas Tsoukalas sounding the alarm for the country.

“If voted on – it seems to be voted on, I hope with the largest majority the proposal for an Inquiry Committee – I think there is no pre -trial investigation”. ” Pavlos Marinakis said in informing political editors, which prompted the immediate reaction of Kostas Tsoukalas.

“The prime minister and the ND MPs should be thought of if all foreign Minds on Thursday morning show that the Greek parliamentary majority fully ignored the European Public Prosecutor’s findings. What will this mean to the institutions and the image of our country will be a second one. “said PASOK’s spokesman.

The battle in Parliament during a plenary debate on the Inquiry Committee, in addition to PASOK President Panagiotis Doudonis, George Nikitiadis and Andreas Poulas.

What was discussed at the KO meeting on Friday

In Harilaou Trikoupis, feverishly prepare for the hot political week we are in. Members reportedly caught pencil and paper and were trained for their appearances in the House and the public sphere, at a meeting via a conference conference on Friday.

PASOK president gave the tone and made it clear once again that the PASOK does not accept any kind of offsetting to OPECEPE scandal. PASOK has no government responsibility allegedly said while reiterating the line of the party and its personal decision, which has already become a practice with the secretary of the Prefecture in Heraklion, Crete, that any party official suspected that it is involved with the scandal will be found.

An important role in informing – informal “tutorials” of MPs was played by the Secretary of Justice of the Party who had the burden of PASOK’s pension of PASOK Christos Kaklamanis, the Secretary of the Rural Development and Food Division Thanassis Petropoulos, and the Secretary of Rural Development and Food.

Mr Korasidis reportedly analyzed the MPs the then decision on the “technical solution” which he explained was not at all legal and after consultation with the partners and had absolutely nothing to do with the practice followed by the European Public Prosecutor’s Office.

The MPs of the Region were mainly interesting and the debate lasted for about two and a half hours.