“Does it confirm or denies the relevant report on the existence of a ‘closed group’ which met with a corresponding Turkish team in Geneva for the purpose of signing a coincidence?”

This query, among other things, address to Foreign minister; K. Gerapetritisof his parliamentarians SYRIZA-PAPin the context of the parliamentary audit on the occasion of a Sunday newspaper publication on the recommendation of “a small closed team, without diplomats but only with friends of mainly lawyers” for negotiations in Geneva “with also a closed team referring exclusively to Erdogan and Fidan.

According to Sunday’s report, the two sides ended up in “Surrounding Plan” that “encloses the hard core of Turkish review policy”, exceeding “The red lines of Greece’s statement to the Hague International Court of Justice in 2015”.

SYRIZA-PSS bishops and MPs, in the absence of a “coherent national strategy of the government”, raise the question of whether the government has a roadmap for a Hague strategy, at the same time calling for the Government to inform the Parliament, adding the question: adding the question: “Why, instead of exploiting the allies of Greece and its position in the EU and the UN SA, instead of processing a clear strategy that strengthens our positions and promoting peace, does secret meetings with the Turkish side, and even without diplomats?”

In detail the question

To the Minister of Foreign Affairs

Subject: Dangerous Secret Diplomacy with Turkey by Foreign Minister

It continues the dangerous, secret diplomacy for national interests, in the context of the IX foreign policy of the given and predictable ally, by the Mitsotakis government. According to a recent newspaper report, the Foreign Minister, with full secrecy, recommended “a small closed team, without diplomats but only with friends of mainly lawyers who sent them back secretly to negotiate in Geneva with a closed team that was also exclusively referring to Erdogan and Erdogan” 2025). The same report states that “the two delegations, Greek and Turkish, according to some information, allegedly met 3-5 times secrets in Geneva and raised all issues related to the Aegean regime, including extreme unilateral claims”. The newspaper writes that the “idea of ​​closed secret negotiations seems to have been first sought at the Gerapetritis -Fidan meeting in Athens in November 2024”. It is also noted that “the two committees met together in Geneva 3 – 5 times from the end of 2024 until the end of March, early April 2025 and resulted in a text that could form a basis for a co -operation”. The newspaper reports that this text was taken into account by Mr Gerapetritis and Mitsotakis and Fidan, Erdogan, respectively, noting that “according to information the co -existing plan (…) encompasses the hard core of Turkish revisionist policy”, exceeding the “Red Court”. The report notes that “at least for the time being” the Greek prime minister “rejected it, believing that the interior conditions are not mature to raise difficult issues”.
There was no response / reaction of the Foreign Ministry to the critical significance of the report. The revelation comes after the last change of cruise – while initially the Prime Minister and the Minister of Foreign Affairs referred to a “in 4 months” context, with the minister stating that for the good of the country he is willing to call him a “bidder”. However, serious negotiations, in this case with Turkey, are not done with verbalism, declarations, constant cruise changes and / or procrastination, without a coherent national strategy of the government.

Of these

Mr. Minister is asked

1. Does it confirm or denies the relevant publication on the existence of a “closed group” which met with a corresponding Turkish team in Geneva for the purpose of signing a coincidence?
2. When does it intend to inform the National Delegation about the meetings of the two delegations and the content of the Construction Plan?
3. With data a) that time does not act in favor of our country in today’s context of acceleration of international developments and b) that Turkey is constantly expanding the agenda with non -existent claims in the context of the revisionist narrative of the Blue Homeland, What is its content?
4. If, as the government often boasts, the international footprint and the alliances of our country are so powerful tools, because it does not exploit them for the pressure, encouragement and commitment of Turkey to be constructed and to retreat from their provocative moods?
5. Why the Foreign Minister, instead of the exploitation of the allies of Greece and its position in the EU and the UN SA, instead of the processing of a clear strategy that strengthens our positions and promotes peace, chooses secret meetings with the Turkish side and even without the participation of diplomats?

The questioners

Dourou Irene (Rena)
Veta Kalliopi
Gavrilos George
Kalamatian Dionysius
Barca Constantine
Notopoulou Catherine (Katerina)
Xanthopoulos Theophilos
Papailiou George
Pappas Nikolaos
Tsapanidou Virgin (Popi)
Psycho