During his interview with ANT1the president of the PASOK-Main of Change Nikos Androulakis commented on statements by government officials that in his scandal OPECEPE “The opposition goes … bucket.”

He spoke of boldness, arrogance and impatience and opposed: “The party is talking about a” bucket “that in the summer at the mandate of the prime minister directed an unprecedented process in Parliament. They kicked out their MPs, left in plenary in plenary, and half voted letters with a single goal not to investigate the responsibilities of Mr Voridis and Mr Avgenakis, as PASOK proposed on the basis of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office. What? Where will the fine for the corruption scandal at OPEKEPE costs up to $ 1 billion to the Greek people? What? Where did the government majority invite any of the “blue” children of the case, the “frappe” and all those who threatened the physical integrity of people and disrupted public money to the Inquiry? They did not call the Lady with Ferrari to the exam, but three dead and use the word “bucket”? “

Referring to yesterday’s development with the Deputy Minister and close associate of Mr. Mitsotakis, George Mylonakishe clarified that “he is drafted into the Inquiry Committee and if they were not afraid of anything, he should have become pre -trial and not examination”.

PASOK’s president stood on a constant motif by Mr Mitsotakis, referring to European prosecutor Laura Kovesi’s statements on the law on the responsibility of ministers.

“When a prime minister is instructed to tool Article 86 to cover and forbid the Justice to investigate the responsibility of his ministers, anything else is out of reality. The European Public Prosecutor’s Office in Athens has camped. Here we have Mrs. Kovesi today and she is talking about Article 86. So what are we discussing? They did not let Mr Karamanlis be checked according to the European case file in Convention 717 of the telecommunication by rejecting PASOK’s proposal for pre -trial. This is a cover -up or not? When you do the same to OPEKEPE, is it a cover -up or not? When you do the same in the spy, is it a cover -up or not? ” He wondered.

N. Androulakis highlighted the proposals he presented to the TIF to strengthen institutions such as the constitutional review of Article 86, the change in the way the leadership of the Justice leadership is not to be a decision of the government and the ban on judges from taking a public position for four years.
“To avoid underground backstage games that” in this case you turn a blind eye to this case, so we will suit you there, “he explained.

In fact, she underlined the political hypocrisy of the New Democracy on it, which, while including this forecast in its program, “has blocked it three times, as well as the times that PASOK has tabled the relevant amendment. Mr Mitsotakis has proven that he wants to tool the institutions. Do we have a prime minister who took the EYP to Maximus, set up, it does not allow justice to do its job, is the whole environment involved in serious scandals, and you tell me that the Greek people want the truth to know and want the distinction of powers? That is not what he does not want. “

Regarding PASOK’s political targeting, Mr. Androulakis stressed: “PASOK has one goal: New Democracy to go to the opposition and become the same government. And I think we can do it. A large part of society now understands that the third term of Mitsotakis means further accuracy, further degradation of the National Health System, further inequalities, so bigger problems, greater impasses. “

Made extensive reference to PASOK’s plan for private debt.

“We suggested 120 installments for everyone to settle their debts to tax and insurance funds. For Swiss franc borrowers, we have a solution to European standards: 1/3 of the exchange rate, growth, will burden the borrower, 2/3 of the creditor. For the services to be compulsory to involve banks and funds in the out -of -court mechanism and not to respond or when they reject, not to justify the rejection in order to be able to go to court. So we brought them to Parliament last week and the New Democracy refused, because in this area it is making the bank game. “

Finally, Nikos Androulakis spoke of a purchase that has been left unacceptable resulting in continuous price and products. And he urged the following comparison: “The 4 years of great precision, how many billions did the oligopolies come out and how many fines – not only did they put them – but also received? And you will understand that the market controls were caresses. “