Kougias: “Atromitos asks that AEK’s objection be rejected – He doesn’t even say what he is asking for”

The position of Alexis Kougia and Atromitos in the case with AEK regarding the issue of the beams is clear. The Peristerians request that the tension of the “Union” be rejected, stressing that only the football prosecutor could intervene!

“The scene with the counting of the beams is comical. It doesn’t say who had a problem”it was his first words lawyer of Atromitos.

“The basis of our claims is that PAE AEK submitted two objections. The first one was submitted to the field which found the measurement 3-5 points and the other beam 2.5 points difference. After a new measurement, one beam was found to be normal. In the 2nd measurement two points were found correct and in the other 2-2.5 points difference. It has an infinitive. The second objection was made so that he could appear because the trial was disciplinary. My colleagues objected to attend. The party must have a legitimate interest.

We have a new objection from AEK without any legal interest. He has a legitimate interest in the first objection. Only the disciplined should attend here and expel all others.

AEK does not say what it is asking for today. Even she is in a procedural quandary. It generally calls for the decision to disappear. What decision? The legal representation of Atromitos requests that AEK’s objection be rejected due to a lack of legal interest and that it is generally unfounded.” clarified.

“The appeal of PAE AEK cannot be discussed and that it is not entitled to be a party. Also, main or additional intervention does not fit into disciplinary cases.

Neither AEK nor Olympiacos nor Panathinaikos can be here today. There is nothing to consider. It is a preliminary matter. And as soon as I finish, I will ask for the interruption of the process to raise the issue of the presence of AEK, Olympiakos and Panathinaikos.

The only person who could appeal is the football prosecutor if he judges that there is a violation by the EPO disciplinary body. The football prosecutor did not appeal and now the case becomes irreversible. Who was the only one who could appeal? The football prosecutor. The disciplinary prosecutor did not appeal: he ruled that there was no violation of the regulation.

The matter has been decided. We ask that you pause, and then we will either continue or withdraw.” he said characteristically.

“The referee did not point out on the match sheet that he is not playing the match because the pitch is unsuitable. How does he say that the field is irregular and he did not play the match. Also that “the only point of irregularity was only one of the two hearths had a lower height than normal. He does not say at which point.

Fifteen years have been in place. Over 600 matches have been played. European level games and no one found that there is a deviation. This is an invisible tape measure. Nor do we know if it was checked and if it was stretched.

Based on the instructions of the international Federations, the referee had to count in 2 points and not in 4, so the count is irregular. Our position is that the 2 points he measured at the junction of the beams are of correct dimensions. Deviations of 6-8 millimeters are allowed.

It is not said which policeman gave the tape measure and from which agency. Police officers have gauges that measure accidents. This measuring tape may have been given by Papadopoulos and was shorter. And why isn’t he here to check it”. He talks about fraud by the referee and talks about Giannis Papadopoulos. Also that the referee did not have the right to measure 4 points but 2 with 10 centimeters from the junction of the beams”, he added in his rejoinder.